Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment

被引:5
|
作者
Ng, Jeremy Y. [1 ]
Bhatt, Hardil Anup [1 ]
Raja, Maheen [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Room 2112,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Complementary and alternative medicine; Systematic review; AGREE II; Clinical practice guideline; DIAGNOSIS; ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; SOCIETY; NEOADJUVANT; DISCLOSURE; TUMORS; LIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.imr.2023.100921
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, which is attributed to limited treatment options. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies have been proposed to provide benefits in treating pancreatic cancer. Despite its importance in treatment, clinicians are not generally well equipped to counsel their patients about CAM therapies. This review identified the quantity and assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) providing CAM rec-ommendations for the treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify pancreatic cancer CPGs. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from 2011 to 2022. The Guidelines International Network (GIN) and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) websites were also searched. Eligible CPGs published by non-profit agencies on treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer for adults were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Results: From 31 eligible search results, 7 CPGs mentioned CAM and 3 CPGs made CAM recommenda-tions. The mean scaled domain percentages of the CPGs in this study (overall, CAM-specific) were as follows: scope and purpose (81.3%, 77.8%), stakeholder involvement (63.9%, 42.6%), rigor-of-development (51.0%, 40.3%), clarity-of-presentation (83.3%, 54.6%), applicability (42.3%, 30.5%), and editorial indepen-dence (58.3%, 58.3%). Conclusions: Evaluation of the CPGs demonstrated that quality varied both within and between CPGs. CPGs that scored well could be used by patients and clinicians as the basis for discussion for the use of CAM therapies. Future research should identify other appropriate CAM therapies for further development of CPGs for pancreatic cancer.Registration: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022334025). (c) 2023 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条