After a few months, what are the uses of OpenAI's ChatGPT in medicine? A Scopus-based systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Moya-Salazar, Jeel [1 ]
Salazar, Carmen R. [2 ]
Delzo, Stephany S. [3 ]
Goicochea-Palomino, Eliane A. [4 ]
Rojas-Zumaran, Victor [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Norbert Wiener, Digital Transformat Ctr, Dept Res, Lima, Peru
[2] Nesh Hubbs, Qualitat Unit, Lima, Peru
[3] Hosp Nacl Docente Madre Nino San Bartolome, Dept Pathol, Lima, Peru
[4] Univ Tecnol Peru, Fac Med Technol, Lima, Peru
来源
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE | 2024年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
machine learning; Scopus; healthcare; ChatGPT; medical writing; artificial intelligence; ethics; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; OPPORTUNITIES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.29333/ejgm/14354
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Acute ChatGPT, an artificial inteeligence-powered chatbot, presents a potential influence on healthcare and research in medicine. In this investigation, we systematically reviewed medical literature regarding the utilization of ChatGPT, utilizing the Scopus database. Methods: This systematic review follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and according to the search in Scopus, 11,219 articles were identified. Original studies, clinical trials, correspondence articles, letters, notes, and research protocols were included, resulting in 14 studies. Results: All studies were published in 2023, among them 35.7% (5/14) were editorials and 14.3% (2/14) were opinion or perspective articles. Only one study (19) conducted a pilot study on the application of ChatGPT in medical diagnosis. Furthermore, 64.3% of the studies were published in quartile 1 journals according to Scimago rankings, and the USA had the highest production of articles on ChatGPT in medicine (35.7%). The included studies highlighted the potential and challenges of ChatGPT in various domains of healthcare. Ethical concerns, such as data privacy and bias, were also analyzed. Various fields of health were evaluated with ChatGPT, including nuclear medicine, gynecology, nuclear medicine, and emergency medicine. ChatGPT was considered a tool to improve patient education. ChatGPT has a promising role in scientific writing, emphasizing the need for human involvement, ethical guidelines, and addressing concerns related to bias, fabrication, and plagiarism. Conclusions: Scopus-retrieved articles underscored the potential advantages and ethical dilemmas associated with the integration of ChatGPT in healthcare. While ChatGPT demonstrated promising applications in various medical domains, caution, further evaluation, and ethical considerations are needed for responsible implementation in real -world clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ChatGPT in medicine: A cross-disciplinary systematic review of ChatGPT's (artificial intelligence) role in research, clinical practice, education, and patient interaction
    Fatima, Afia
    Shafique, Muhammad Ashir
    Alam, Khadija
    Ahmed, Tagwa Kalool Fadlalla
    Mustafa, Muhammad Saqlain
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (32)
  • [2] What is personalized medicine: sharpening a vague term based on a systematic literature review
    Sebastian Schleidgen
    Corinna Klingler
    Teresa Bertram
    Wolf H Rogowski
    Georg Marckmann
    BMC Medical Ethics, 14
  • [3] What is personalized medicine: sharpening a vague term based on a systematic literature review
    Schleidgen, Sebastian
    Klingler, Corinna
    Bertram, Teresa
    Rogowski, Wolf H.
    Marckmann, Georg
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2013, 14
  • [4] What Are the Barriers to Residents' Practicing Evidence-Based Medicine? A Systematic Review
    van Dijk, Nynke
    Hooft, Lotty
    Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (07) : 1163 - 1170
  • [5] What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review
    Coomarasamy, A
    Khan, KS
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7473): : 1017 - 1019
  • [6] OUTCOMES AFTER UNSTABLE FRACTURES OF THE ANKLE: WHAT'S NEW? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Monestier, Luca
    Riva, Giacomo
    Zabetta, Lorenzo Coda
    Surace, Michele F.
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [7] What factors at discharge predict physical activity and walking outcomes 6 months after stroke? A systematic review
    Nayak, Neelam
    Mahendran, Niruthikha
    Kuys, Suzanne
    Brauer, Sandra G.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 38 (10) : 1393 - 1403
  • [8] A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets: is what's on the label what's in the product?
    Oldfield, Karen
    Ryan, John
    Doppen, Marjan
    Kung, Stacey
    Braithwaite, Irene
    Newton-Howes, Giles
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 29 (01) : 88 - 96
  • [9] Oxford's Systematic Review Initiative: leading by example in evidence-based transfusion medicine
    Fergusson, D. A.
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2016, 26 (06) : 397 - 400
  • [10] What's important for recovery after a total knee replacement? A systematic review of mixed methods studies
    Khatri, Chetan
    Ahmed, Imran
    Dhaif, Fatema
    Rodrigues, Jeremy
    Underwood, Martin
    Davis, Edward T.
    Mitchell, Paul
    Metcalfe, Andrew
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (05) : 2213 - 2221