Revision rotator cuff repair: can a Sugaya III tendon considered to be healed or not

被引:1
|
作者
Werthel, Jean-David [1 ,7 ]
Godeneche, Arnaud [2 ]
Antoni, Maxime [3 ]
Valenti, Philippe [4 ]
Chelli, Mikael [5 ]
Nove-Joseerand, Laurent [2 ]
Bonnevialle, Nicolas [6 ]
机构
[1] Hop Ambroise Pare, Orthoped Dept, Boulogne Billancourt, France
[2] Jean Mermoz Private Hosp, Ctr Orthoped Santy, Ramsay Gen Sante, Lyon, France
[3] Orthoped Dept, CHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
[4] Orthoped Dept, Clin Bizet, Paris, France
[5] Inst Chirurg Reparatrice, Grp Kantys, Nice, France
[6] CHU Toulouse Hop Purpan, Orthoped Dept, Toulouse, France
[7] Hop Ambroise Pare, 9 Ave Charles de Gaulle, F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
关键词
Retear; failed cuff repair; tendon healing; cuff revision repair; long-term; Sugaya classification; ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR; INTEGRITY; TEARS; CLASSIFICATION; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.028
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sugaya et al described a classification system to assess postoperative rotator cuff tendon healing. Although Sugaya I and II tendons can be considered as healed and Sugaya type IV and V can be considered as retorn, the exact status of Sugaya III tendons remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of Sugaya III tendons on postoperative functional scores in a population of patients undergoing revision rotator cuff repair. Methods: We retrospectively studied the records of all patients who underwent revision rotator cuff repair in one of 12 different institutions between July 2001 and December 2020. A total of 203 shoulders were included (59% males, mean age: 51 +/- 8 years old, mean follow-up 11.5 years [range: 2-28.8 yr]). Fifty-four patients (61% males, mean age 52 +/- 6 years old, mean follow-up 14.1 years [range: 10.4-28.8 yr]) had a follow-up >= 10 years (mean 14.1 years [range: 10.4-28.8 yr]) and were included in a long-term follow-up subgroup analysis. Structural integrity of the repaired tendon was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging at last follow-up. Functional scores, acromiohumeral index (AHI), and progression of fatty infiltration and of osteoarthritis were compared according to Sugaya type. Results: Mean Constant score and mean strength were significantly higher in Sugaya I and II tendons than in Sugaya III (P = .021 and .003) and Sugaya IV and V tendons (P = .07 and .038), but did not differ between Sugaya III and Sugaya IV and V tendons. Mean Subjective Shoulder Value, pain, AHI were significantly higher and fatty infiltration and progression in the Hamada classification were significantly lower in Sugaya I and II tendons and in Sugaya III than in Sugaya IV and V tendons (P < .05), but did not differ between Sugaya I and II and Sugaya III tendons. Similar characteristics could also be observed in the long-term follow-up subgroup. Conclusion: Sugaya III tendons after revision rotator cuff repair do not allow restoration of strength thereby impacting the Constant score. However, there seems to be a protective effect of Sugaya III tendons with regard to pain, progression of proximal migration of the humeral head, osteoarthritis, and fatty infiltration, which seems to last at long-term follow-up. (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 262
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revision Rotator Cuff Repair
    Keener, Jay D.
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (04) : 713 - +
  • [2] Revision rotator cuff repair versus primary repair: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes in revision rotator cuff repair
    Roge, Seth A.
    Valiquette, Andrew M.
    Teng, Bi Qing
    Yang, Kai
    Grindel, Steven I.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (03) : 860 - 868
  • [3] Outcome of revision rotator cuff repair
    Meyer, Dominik
    Antoniadis, Alexander
    Jentzsch, Thorsten
    Dietrich, Tobias Johannes
    Catanzaro, Sabrina
    Gerber, Christian
    Mauler, Flavien
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 41S - 41S
  • [4] Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Burkhart, Stephen S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2011, 19 (11) : 657 - 666
  • [5] Failed and Revision Rotator Cuff Repair
    MacLean, Ian S.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (01) : 141 - 155
  • [6] PRP as an Adjunct to Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair
    Barber, F. Alan
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2018, 26 (02): : 42 - 47
  • [7] Biological augmentation of rotator cuff tendon repair
    Kovacevic, David
    Rodeo, Scott A.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (03) : 622 - 633
  • [8] Tendon Trap Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair
    Chung, Nam-Soo
    Cho, Jae-Ho
    Han, Kyeong-Jin
    Han, Seung-Hwan
    Lee, Doo-Hyung
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (12) : 1035 - 1038
  • [9] Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff tendon repair
    Rodeo, Scott A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (05) : 191S - 197S
  • [10] Revision rotator cuff repair: a systematic review
    Brochin, Robert L.
    Zastrow, Ryley
    Hussey-Andersen, Lindsay
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Cagle, Paul J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (03) : 624 - 633