Breeding of Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivar Keyun1 and Exploration of Nitrogen Application and Planting Density

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, G. D. [1 ]
Hu, Z. Y. [1 ]
Hao, Z. Y. [1 ]
Li, J. H. [1 ]
Sun, B. S. [1 ]
Meng, X. X. [2 ]
Wang, Q. [2 ]
机构
[1] Heilongjiang Acad Agr Sci, Keshan Branch, Shenjiang Rd, Qiqihar 161005, Peoples R China
[2] Heilongjiang Acad Agr Sci, Crop Resources Inst, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Grain yield; Kidney bean; Nitrogen fertilization; Planting density; Systematic selection;
D O I
10.18805/LRF-732
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Background: Small white Kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is popular in the international market, they are widely cultivated in the high and cold areas of China. However, these areas have relatively short growth period, resulting in the low yield and quality of kidney beans, which limits the development of kidney bean. Keyun1 has since played an important role in improving kidney bean production in the country since 2020 because of its high yields, good upright and wide adaptability. Methods: Keyun1 is a small grain white kidney bean cultivar that was developed by a systematic selection of excellent mutants in China in 2020. Result: The average yield of Keyun1 was 2346.26 kg/ha, 34.42% higher than that of the control cultivar (British Red) in the national joint identification test of new kidney bean cultivars of China from 2016 to 2017. In 2018, Keyun1 was included in the national joint identification and production test of new kidney bean cultivars of China, the average yield per hectare was 2076.58 kg, which is 67.99% higher than that of the control cultivar (British Red) and exploration of nitrogen application and planting density showed the best nitrogen application that is 45 kg of active ingredient nitrogen per hectare and the best planting density is 15x10(4) -20x10(4) plants/ha, the greatest yield was 3198.17 kg/ha.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1294
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Kelly, JD
    Judith, MK
    Schneider, K
    EUPHYTICA, 1998, 102 (03) : 343 - 356
  • [2] Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    James D. Kelly
    Judith M. Kolkman
    Kristin Schneider
    Euphytica, 1998, 102 : 343 - 356
  • [3] Biotechnology approaches in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) breeding
    Saglam, Sevil
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 231 : S17 - S17
  • [4] Effects of planting season and plant cultivar on growth, development, and pod production in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Perez-Barbeito, Marlene
    Gonzalez, Ana Maria
    Rodino, Ana Paula
    De Ron, Antonio Miguel
    Santalla, Marta
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (12): : 1121 - 1129
  • [5] Breeding for bean fly resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a review
    Nkhata, Wilson
    Shimelis, Hussein
    Melis, Rob
    Chirwa, Rowland
    Mzengeza, Tenyson
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 69 (03): : 275 - 285
  • [6] Effect of planting distance and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and physiological traits of Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Merzai, Mohammad Sadiq
    Salari, Mohammad Wali
    Kazimi, Rahmatullah
    PLANT SCIENCE TODAY, 2024, 11 (04): : 701 - 707
  • [7] Clinical complications of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) consumption
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Verma, Alok Kumar
    Das, Mukul
    Jain, S. K.
    Dwivedi, Premendra D.
    NUTRITION, 2013, 29 (06) : 821 - 827
  • [8] Breeding for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rust resistance in Brazil
    Souza, Thiago Livio P. O.
    Faleiro, Fabio G.
    Dessaune, Suelen N.
    de Paula-Junior, Trazilbo J.
    Moreira, Maurilio A.
    de Barros, Everaldo G.
    TROPICAL PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2013, 38 (05): : 361 - 374
  • [9] Salt tolerance of a common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar as affected by rhizobia
    Zaman-Allah, M
    Sifi, B
    Issoufou, M
    El Aouni, MH
    SYMBIOSIS, 2005, 40 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [10] DRY BEAN (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS L) YIELD AS AFFECTED BY PLANTING DENSITY AND ARRANGEMENT
    PINCHINAT, AM
    TURRIALBA, 1974, 24 (02): : 173 - 175