Experiences from the commission of experts

被引:0
|
作者
Steffens, Felix [1 ]
Steffens, Joachim [2 ]
Kranz, Jennifer [3 ]
Enzmann, Thomas [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Mannheim, Klin Urol & Urochirurg, Mannheim, Germany
[2] St Antonius Hosp gGmbH, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, Eschweiler, Germany
[3] Uniklin RWTH Aachen, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, Aachen, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Brandenburg Havel, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, Brandenburg, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Brandenburg Havel, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, Hochstr 29, D-14776 Brandenburg, Germany
来源
UROLOGIE | 2023年 / 62卷 / 03期
关键词
Liability issue; Malpractice; Dispute resolution; Expert opinion; Medical errors;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-023-02034-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The task of the commission of experts on medical errors is to provide a neutral and independent assessment of a treatment for which a physician is responsible and evaluate the liability issue. The objective evaluation is intended to make it easier for the person whose health has been damaged by a treatment error to assert justified claims and for the physician to reject unfounded accusations. The aim is to promote amicable dispute resolution. For the legal classification of the term "complication ", a definition is necessary. The physician understands this to mean a deviation from the actual course and consequences of treatment. The lawyer sees a complication as an undesirable consequence of incorrect patients' information or treatment. One-third of all court cases end with a finding of medical malpractice. This rate corresponds to the medical malpractice rate in medical malpractice litigation. If medical malpractice is found, the physician's liability insurance is contacted to settle the claim. If the commission of experts denies medical malpractice, the patient usually refrains from taking legal action.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 260
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erfahrungen aus der GutachterkommissionExperiences from the commission of experts
    Felix Steffens
    Joachim Steffens
    Jennifer Kranz
    Thomas Enzmann
    Die Urologie, 2023, 62 : 256 - 260
  • [2] Commission of Experts on Taxonomic Identification in Russia
    Galtsova, VV
    ZOOLOGICHESKY ZHURNAL, 1996, 75 (04): : 635 - 636
  • [3] Sidelined Member States: Commission-learning from Experts in the Face of Comitology
    Boehling, Kathrin
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2014, 36 (02) : 117 - 134
  • [4] Experts' knowledge and communication: the technical commission of the TBE
    Krahl, Gotz
    ZI, Ziegelindustrie International, 1995, 48 (10):
  • [5] Preface to the Report of the Commission of Experts of the Federal Psychotherapists Chamber
    Eckert, Jochen
    Richter, Rainer
    PSYCHODYNAMISCHE PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2008, 7 (02): : 88 - 91
  • [8] EXPERTS OPINION OF TAX REFORM COMMISSION, 1971 - GERMAN
    KNATZ, T
    MODERN LAW AND SOCIETY, 1971, 4 (02): : 147 - 148
  • [9] Experts reviews of the multidisciplinary consensus conference colon and rectal cancer 2012: Science, opinions and experiences from the experts of surgery
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    Boelens, P. G.
    Tanis, P. J.
    Espin, E.
    Mroczkowski, P.
    Naredi, P.
    Pahlman, L.
    Ortiz, H.
    Rutten, H. J.
    Breugom, A. J.
    Smith, J. J.
    Wibe, A.
    Wiggers, T.
    Valentini, V.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (04): : 454 - 468
  • [10] EXPERIENCES OF THE ANIMAL-WELFARE COMMISSION
    GRAPENTIN, K
    TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 1991, 46 (10): : 604 - 606