Comparative studies on in vitro antitumor activities and apoptosis-inducing effects of enantiomeric ruthenium(ii) complexes

On the basis of our previous comparative studies on the DNA binding of a pair of ruthenium(ii) complex enantiomers, & UDelta;-[Ru(bpy)(2)PBIP](2+) and ?-[Ru(bpy)(2)PBIP](2+) {bpy = 2,2 & PRIME;-bipyridine, PBIP = 2-(4-bromophenyl)imidazo[4,5-f]1,10-phenanthroline}, in this study, their antitumor activities and mechanisms were further investigated comparatively. The cytotoxicity assay demonstrated that both the enantiomers exerted selective antiproliferative effects on cancer cell lines A2780 and PC3. Fluorescence localization experiments suggested that both the enantiomers effectively permeated the nucleus of HeLa cells and co-localized with DNA, resulting in their DNA damage and apoptosis. Flow cytometry experiments showed that the apoptosis was enhanced by increasing the concentration of each enantiomer. Western blotting analyses indicated that both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathways were activated by the two enantiomers. miRNA microarray analyses displayed that both the enantiomers up- and downregulated multiple miRNAs, some of which were predicted to be associated with carcinogenesis. The above experimental results also showed that the & UDelta;-enantiomer exerted a more potent antitumor activity, a higher efficiency of entering cancer cells and a stronger apoptosis-inducing effect compared with the ?-enantiomer. Combined with the previously published research results, experimental results from this study implied that the antitumor activity of a metal complex might have originated from the conformation change of DNA in tumor cells caused by the intercalation of the complex, that the antitumor mechanism of a metal complex could be related to its DNA-binding mode, and that the antitumor efficiency of a metal complex could result from its DNA-binding strength.