Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Yetis, Mehmet [1 ]
Ceylan, Ismail [2 ]
Canli, Mehmet [2 ]
Gurses, Omer Alperen [2 ]
Aslan, Mensure [2 ]
Horoz, Levent [1 ]
Tayfur, Abdulhamit [2 ]
机构
[1] Kirsehir Ahi Evran Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Kirsehir, Turkiye
[2] Kirsehir Ahi Evran Univ, Sch Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Kirsehir, Turkiye
关键词
validity; reliability; munich wrist questionnaire; patient reported outcome measure; SHOULDER; HAND; DASH; ARM; DISABILITIES; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1177/01632787231172276
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence for the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ), a patient reported outcome measurement tool (PROM) was evaluated. A total of 80 patients (54.1 +/- 1.4 years, 68 females) with wrist problems were recruited. The MWQ was translated into Turkish (MWQ-TR). Criterion validity with Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the test-retest reliability. There was a moderate correlation (r = -0.49, p < 0.001) between MWQ-TR and DASH, while correlations were strong between MWQ-TR and PRWE (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of MWQ-TR was moderate (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI 0.26-0.84). The MWQ-Turkish version demonstrated evidence for its validity and reliability to evaluate pain, work/daily life activities and function in people with wrist problems in a Turkish population.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
    Erdogan, Sengul
    Ucpunar, Habibe K.
    Cangoz Tavat, Banu
    [J]. TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [2] Validity and reliability of the Turkish "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire
    Ozturk, Ozgul
    Sari, Zubeyir
    Ozgul, Bahar
    Tasyikan, Levent
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2015, 49 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [3] The Turkish Version of the Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire: factor structure, validity, and reliability
    Ongun Yilmaz, Hande
    [J]. ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 21 : 29 - 36
  • [4] Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire
    Topcu, Deniz Oke
    Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (02) : 574 - +
  • [5] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in COPD patients
    Kurhan, Fikret
    Goktalay, Tugba
    Havlucu, Yavuz
    Sari, Secil
    Yorgancioglu, Arzu
    Celik, Pinar
    Coskun, Aysin Sakar
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (04) : 811 - 816
  • [6] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma
    cakmak, Aslihan
    Simsek, Senem
    Ince, Deniz Inal
    Saglam, Melda
    Kutukcue, Ebru Calik
    Yagli, Naciye Vardar
    Karakaya, Guel
    [J]. THORACIC RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 24 (04) : 194 - 201
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the morningness - Eveningness questionnaire
    Ozdalyan, Firat
    Tutuncu, Ozkan
    Gumus, Hikmet
    Acikgoz, Osman
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (01): : 50 - 59
  • [8] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE
    SAHIN, NH
    SAHIN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 48 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [9] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of breathlessness beliefs questionnaire
    Gurses, Hulya Nilgun
    Saka, Seda
    Zeren, Melih
    Bayram, Mehmet
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (04) : 834 - 839
  • [10] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of clinical stress questionnaire
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Acaroglu, Rengin
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2008, 28 (06) : 737 - 743