Group decision-making theories for child and family social work

被引:2
|
作者
Alfandari, Ravit [1 ]
Taylor, Brian J. [2 ]
Enosh, Guy [1 ]
Killick, Campbell [2 ]
McCafferty, Paul [3 ]
Mullineux, Judith [2 ]
Przeperski, Jaroslaw [4 ]
Rolver, Michael [5 ]
Whittaker, Andrew [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Sch Social Work, Abba Khoushi 199, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[2] Ulster Univ, Sch Appl Social & Policy Sci, Derry, Londonderry, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ, Sch Social Sci Educ & Social Work, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Ctr Family Res, Torun, Poland
[5] Univ Munster, Inst Sociol, Munster, Germany
[6] London South Bank Univ, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London, England
关键词
Group; decision-making; social work; children and families; theory; INTERPROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE; ESCALATION; COMMITMENT; MODELS; RISK; COLLABORATION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; JUDGMENT; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1080/13691457.2021.2016651
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in decision making in social work. Much of the attention has been on individual professional judgement rather than on group decisions processes. This paper outlines key theoretical approaches from diverse fields of knowledge for conceptualising professional group decision processes in child and family social work, as a framework for future research and more focused theoretical developments. The main theoretical approaches considered include (1) group consensus processes; (2) exchange and the use of information; (3) naturalistic studies emphasising group complexity; and (4) incremental improvement processes. The analysis highlights the possible impact of individual, organisational and contextual factors, as well as their complex interconnections, on group decision making. The paper provides a valuable resource for reflecting on group decision processes in child and family social work, and how they complement individual professional judgements and the interactive processes with children and families. Next steps for the development of practice, policy, and research to improve group decision making are discussed. Using theoretical models to underpin empirical research will enable greater connection to be made between studies, and hence further the knowledge base for social work in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 217
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOCIAL CHARACTER AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    BURTON, GE
    PATHAK, DS
    [J]. SAM ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1978, 43 (03): : 12 - 20
  • [2] Building evidence for family group decision-making in child welfare: operationalizing the intervention
    Lalayants, Marina
    DePanfilis, Diane
    Merkel-Holguin, Lisa
    Baldwin, Melinda
    Schmidt, Michele
    Treinen, Julie
    Zuniga, Danielle
    Mackereth, Casey
    Anderson, Taylor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE, 2022, 16 (03) : 376 - 401
  • [3] IMPROVING WORK GROUP DECISION-MAKING EFFECTIVENESS
    SCHOONOVERSHOFFNER, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 1989, 19 (07): : 10 - 16
  • [4] Professional judgement and decision-making in social work
    Taylor, Brian
    Whittaker, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2018, 32 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [5] DECISION-MAKING IN SOCIAL-WORK - A REVIEW
    CUZZI, LF
    HOLDEN, G
    GROB, GG
    BAZER, C
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 1993, 18 (02) : 1 - 22
  • [6] FAMILY, SOCIAL-CLASS AND DECISION-MAKING
    CHEBAT, JC
    [J]. REVUE FRANCAISE DU MARKETING, 1977, (71): : 45 - 53
  • [7] Entrepreneurial decision-making and family social capital
    Wang, Cizhi
    Flamini, Giulia
    Wang, Kai
    Pei, Rong
    Chen, Chiyin
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (05) : 938 - 952
  • [8] A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF GROUP PROCESSES FOR DECISION-MAKING
    LEVONIAN, E
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1966, 26 (02) : 530 - &
  • [9] A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF GROUP PROCESSES FOR DECISION-MAKING
    CHERNS, AB
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1966, 9 (01) : 83 - &
  • [10] Children, family and the state: Decision-making and child participation
    Ghysels, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE FAMILY STUDIES, 2004, 35 (03) : 508 - 510