Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care

被引:5
|
作者
Dlugatch, Rachel [1 ]
Georgieva, Antoniya [2 ]
Kerasidou, Angeliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ethox Ctr, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Old Rd Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Womens Ctr, Nuffield Dept Womens & Reprod Hlth, Level 3, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
关键词
Trust; Trustworthiness; Artificial intelligence; Ethical design; Public perception; Cardiotocography; VALUES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-023-00917-w
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDespite the recognition that developing artificial intelligence (AI) that is trustworthy is necessary for public acceptability and the successful implementation of AI in healthcare contexts, perspectives from key stakeholders are often absent from discourse on the ethical design, development, and deployment of AI. This study explores the perspectives of birth parents and mothers on the introduction of AI-based cardiotocography (CTG) in the context of intrapartum care, focusing on issues pertaining to trust and trustworthiness.MethodsSeventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with birth parents and mothers based on a speculative case study. Interviewees were based in England and were pregnant and/or had given birth in the last two years. Thematic analysis was used to analyze transcribed interviews with the use of NVivo. Major recurring themes acted as the basis for identifying the values most important to this population group for evaluating the trustworthiness of AI.ResultsThree themes pertaining to the perceived trustworthiness of AI emerged from interviews: (1) trustworthy AI-developing institutions, (2) trustworthy data from which AI is built, and (3) trustworthy decisions made with the assistance of AI. We found that birth parents and mothers trusted public institutions over private companies to develop AI, that they evaluated the trustworthiness of data by how representative it is of all population groups, and that they perceived trustworthy decisions as being mediated by humans even when supported by AI.ConclusionsThe ethical values that underscore birth parents and mothers' perceptions of trustworthy AI include fairness and reliability, as well as practices like patient-centered care, the promotion of publicly funded healthcare, holistic care, and personalized medicine. Ultimately, these are also the ethical values that people want to protect in the healthcare system. Therefore, trustworthy AI is best understood not as a list of design features but in relation to how it undermines or promotes the ethical values that matter most to its end users. An ethical commitment to these values when creating AI in healthcare contexts opens up new challenges and possibilities for the design and deployment of AI.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care
    Rachel Dlugatch
    Antoniya Georgieva
    Angeliki Kerasidou
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 24
  • [2] Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review
    Cartolovni, Anto
    Tomicic, Ana
    Mosler, Elvira Lazic
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 161
  • [3] User Interface Design for AI-Based Clinical Decision-Support System Preliminary Study
    Beltrao, Gabriela
    Paramonova, Iuliia
    Sousa, Sonia
    [J]. 2022 17TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2022,
  • [4] An evidence-based ethical decision-support tool for physicians and parents in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
    Walker, RC
    Frize, M
    Yang, L
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 56A - 56A
  • [5] Initial User-Centred Design of an AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Primary Care
    Neff, Michaela Christina
    Schaaf, Jannik
    Noll, Richard
    Holtz, Svea
    Schuetze, Dania
    Koehler, Susanne Maria
    Mueller, Beate
    Ahmadi, Najia
    Von Wagner, Michael
    Storf, Holger
    [J]. MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 1051 - 1055
  • [6] From service design thinking to the third generation of activity theory: a new model for designing AI-based decision-support systems
    Marocco, Silvia
    Talamo, Alessandra
    Quintiliani, Francesca
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [7] Applying Design Thinking to Develop AI-Based Multi-Actor Decision-Support Systems: A Case Study on Human Capital Investments
    Marocco, Silvia
    Talamo, Alessandra
    Quintiliani, Francesca
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (13):
  • [8] Design of a Human-in-the-Loop Centered AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Professional Care Planning
    Steffny, Laura
    Dahlem, Nanna
    Reichl, Lea
    Gisa, Kevin
    Greff, Tobias
    Werth, Dirk
    [J]. HHAI 2023: AUGMENTING HUMAN INTELLECT, 2023, 368 : 263 - 273
  • [9] Making Co-Design More Responsible:Case Study on theDevelopment of an AI-Based Decision Support System inDementia Care
    Lukkien, Dirk R. M.
    Askar, Sima Ipakchian
    Stolwijk, Nathalie E.
    Hofstede, Bob M.
    Nap, Henk Herman
    Boon, Wouter P. C.
    Peine, Alexander
    Moors, Ellen H. M.
    Minkman, Mirella M. N.
    [J]. JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 11
  • [10] Rationale and design of the GOLDEN BRIDGE II: a cluster-randomised multifaceted intervention trial of an artificial intelligence-based cerebrovascular disease clinical decision support system to improve stroke outcomes and care quality in China
    Li, Zixiao
    Zhang, Xinmiao
    Ding, Lingling
    Jing, Jing
    Gu, Hong-Qiu
    Jiang, Yong
    Meng, Xia
    Du, Chunying
    Wang, Chunjuan
    Wang, Meng
    Xu, Man
    Zhang, Yanxu
    Hu, Meera
    Li, Hao
    Gong, Xiping
    Dong, Kehui
    Zhao, Xingquan
    Wang, Yilong
    Liu, Liping
    Xian, Ying
    Peterson, Eric
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Schwamm, Lee H.
    Wang, Yongjun
    [J]. STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2023,