Soft tissue changes with skeletal anchorage in comparison to conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients treated with premolar extraction A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Mohan, Kumeran [1 ,3 ]
Sivarajan, Saritha [1 ]
Lau, May Nak [1 ]
Othman, Siti Adibah [1 ]
Fayed, Mona M. Salah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Dent, Dept Paediat Dent & Orthodont, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Kulliyyah Dent, Dept Orthodont, Kuantan, Malaysia
关键词
Systematic review; Dental occlusion; Facial profile; Dental esthetics; Orthodontic anchorage procedures; EN-MASSE RETRACTION; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; DENTOALVEOLAR PROTRUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; ANTERIOR TEETH; ADULTS; HEADGEAR; IMPLANTS; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1007/s00056-022-00411-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This review systematically evaluates the evidence related to comparisons between skeletal and conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients who underwent premolars extraction with respect to soft tissue profile changes, treatment duration and three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue changes. Methods Electronic database search and hand search with no language limitations were conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov. The selection criteria were set to include studies with patients aged 13 years and above requiring extractions of upper and lower first premolars to treat bimaxillary proclination with high anchorage demand. Risk of bias assessment was undertaken with Cochrane's Risk Of Bias tool 2.0 (ROB 2.0) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I tool for nonrandomised prospective studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for quality assessment. Results were summarised qualitatively; no meta-analysis was conducted. Results Two RCTs and two nonrandomised prospective studies were included. According to the GRADE approach, there is low to very low quality of evidence that treatment using mini-implant anchorage may significantly change nasolabial angle, upper and lower lip procumbence, and facial convexity angle compared to treatment with conventional anchorage. Similarly, very low quality evidence exists showing no differences in treatment duration between treatments with skeletal or conventional anchorage. Conclusions The overall existing evidence regarding the effect of anchorage protocols on soft tissue changes in patients with bimaxillary protrusion and premolar extraction treatment plans is of low quality. Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020216684
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 162
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Soft tissue changes with skeletal anchorage in comparison to conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients treated with premolar extraction: A systematic review; [Veränderungen des Weichgewebes bei skelettaler Verankerung im Vergleich zu konventionellen Verankerungsprotokollen bei der Behandlung von Patienten mit bimaxillärer Protrusion und Extraktion von Prämolaren: Ein systematischer Review]
    Mohan K.
    Sivarajan S.
    Lau M.N.
    Othman S.A.
    Fayed M.M.S.
    Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2024, 85 (2): : 146 - 162
  • [2] SOFT TISSUE CHANGES IN PATIENTS WITH DENTOALVEOLAR PROTRUSION TREATED WITH MAXIMUM ANCHORAGE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Liu, Yan
    Yang, Zhen-Jin
    Zhou, Jing
    Xiong, Ping
    Wang, Quan
    Yang, Yan
    Hu, Yu
    Hu, Jiang-Tian
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (04)
  • [3] Dental, skeletal and soft tissue changes after bimaxillary protrusion treatment with temporary anchorage devices using different retraction mechanics
    Kotoe Mayahara
    Satoru Kawai
    Tomihiro Fujisaki
    Noriyoshi Shimizu
    BMC Oral Health, 24
  • [4] Dental, skeletal and soft tissue changes after bimaxillary protrusion treatment with temporary anchorage devices using different retraction mechanics
    Mayahara, Kotoe
    Kawai, Satoru
    Fujisaki, Tomihiro
    Shimizu, Noriyoshi
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Comparison Between first and Second Premolar Extraction: Effects on Soft Tissue Profile Changes After Orthodontic Treatment in Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion
    Atqahtani, Nasser D.
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 14 (02): : 811 - 821
  • [6] COMPARISON OF ANCHORAGE EFFICIENCY OF ORTHODONTIC MINI-IMPLANT AND CONVENTIONAL ANCHORAGE REINFORCEMENT IN PATIENTS REQUIRING MAXIMUM ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Liu, Yan
    Yang, Zhen-Jin
    Zhou, Jing
    Xiong, Ping
    Wang, Quan
    Yang, Yan
    Hu, Yu
    Hu, Jiang-Tian
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2020, 20 (02)
  • [7] Evaluation of treatment outcomes of en masse retraction with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in comparison with two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khlef, Hanin Nizar
    Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
    Ajaj, Mowaffak A.
    Heshmeh, Omar
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (04) : 513 - 523
  • [8] Three-Dimensional Digital Image Analysis of Skeletal and Soft Tissue Points A and B after Orthodontic Treatment with Premolar Extraction in Bimaxillary Protrusive Patients
    Lim, You Na
    Yang, Byoung-Eun
    Byun, Soo-Hwan
    Yi, Sang-Min
    On, Sung-Woon
    Park, In-Young
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2022, 11 (03):
  • [10] Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in Class III patients treated with fixed appliances and lower premolar extractions
    Abu Alhaija, Elham S. J.
    Al-Khateeb, Susan N.
    AUSTRALIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2011, 27 (01) : 40 - 45