Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs

被引:0
|
作者
Bould, Em [1 ]
Tate, Robyn [2 ,3 ]
Simpson, Grahame [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brusco, Natasha [5 ]
Licciardi, Lisa
Callaway, Libby [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Frankston, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Kolling Inst, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[3] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, John Walsh Ctr Rehabil Res, Sydney, Australia
[4] Ingham Inst, Brain Injury Rehabil Res Grp, Sydney, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Rehabil, Frankston, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Dept Occupat Therapy Rehabil, Frankston, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Dept Occupat Therapy Rehabil, 47-49 Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston 3199, Australia
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
acquired brain injury; assistive technology; clinical research protocol; economic evaluation; executive function; single-case experimental design; THERAPY GOALS; REHABILITATION; SCALE; BEHAVIOR; INTERVENTION; RELIABILITY; INTEGRATION; QUALITY; HONOS; NEEDS;
D O I
10.2196/48503
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Executive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over time. To compensate for the executive dysfunction experienced, growing options for electronic mainstream and assistive technologies may be used by people with ABI and their supporters.Objective: We outline the study protocol for a series of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) to evaluate the effectiveness of smart home, mobile, and/or wearable technologies in reducing executive function difficulties following ABI.Methods: Up to 10 adults with ABI who experience executive dysfunction and have sufficient cognitive capacity to provide informed consent will be recruited across Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Other key inclusion criteria are that they have substantial support needs for everyday living and reside in community dwellings. On the basis of the participant's identified goal(s) and target behavior(s), a specific electronic assistive technology will be selected for application. Both identification of the target behavior(s) and selection of the assistive technology will be determined via consultation with each participant (and their key support person, if applicable). The choice of SCED will be individualized for each participant based on the type of technology used in the intervention, the difficulty level of the behavior targeted for change, and the anticipated rate of change. For each SCED, repeated measurements of the target behavior(s) during the baseline condition will provide performance data for comparison with the performance data collected during the intervention condition (with technology introduced). Secondary outcome measures will evaluate the impact of the intervention. The protocol includes 2 customizable Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for electronic record keeping.Results: Recruitment period is June 2022 through March 2024. Trial results for the individual participants will be graphed and analyzed separately using structured visual analysis supplemented with statistical analysis. Analysis will focus on important features of the data, including both within-and between-phase comparisons for response level, trend, variability, immediacy, consistency, and overlap. An exploratory economic evaluation will determine the impact on formal and informal support usage, together with quality of life, following the implementation of the new technological intervention.Conclusions: The study has been designed to test the cause-effect functional relationships between the intervention-in this case, electronic assistive technology-and its effect in changing the target behavior(s). The evaluation evidence gained will offer new insights into the application of various electronic assistive technologies for people who experience executive dysfunction following ABI. Furthermore, the results will help increase the capacity of key stakeholders to harness the potential of technology to build independence and reduce the cost of care for this population.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000835741, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000835741.aspx International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48503
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of executive function impairments in adults with acquired brain injury across single-case experimental design: A scoping review of primary outcomes
    Lebely, C.
    Lepron, E.
    Villepinte, C.
    Scannella, S.
    De Boissezon, X.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [2] Evaluating the Use of Smart Home Technology by People With Brain Impairment: Protocol for a Single-Case Experimental Design
    Jamwal, Rebecca
    Callaway, Libby
    Winkler, Di
    Farnworth, Louise
    Tate, Robyn
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (11):
  • [3] Intelligent speed adaptation as an assistive device for drivers with acquired brain injury: A single-case field experiment
    Klarborg, Brith
    Lahrmann, Harry
    Agerholm, Niels
    Tradisauskas, Nerius
    Harms, Lisbeth
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2012, 48 : 57 - 62
  • [4] Adaptive manuals as assistive technology to support and train people with acquired brain injury in their daily life activities
    Gomez, Javier
    Montoro, German
    Haya, Pablo A.
    Alaman, Xavier
    Alves, Susana
    Martinez, Monica
    [J]. PERSONAL AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2013, 17 (06) : 1117 - 1126
  • [5] Adaptive manuals as assistive technology to support and train people with acquired brain injury in their daily life activities
    Javier Gómez
    Germán Montoro
    Pablo A. Haya
    Xavier Alamán
    Susana Alves
    Mónica Martínez
    [J]. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2013, 17 : 1117 - 1126
  • [6] SINGLE-CASE EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS AND PROGRAM-EVALUATION
    HORN, WF
    HEERBOTH, J
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1982, 6 (03) : 403 - 424
  • [7] Systematic instruction of assistive technology for cognition (ATC) in an employment setting following acquired brain injury: A single case, experimental study
    Powell, Laurie E.
    Glang, Ann
    Pinkelman, Sarah
    Albin, Richard
    Harwick, Robin
    Ettel, Deborah
    Wild, Michelle R.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (03) : 437 - 447
  • [8] Single-case experimental designs for bumetanide across neurodevelopmental disorders: BUDDI protocol
    Lisa Geertjens
    Gianina Cristian
    Eva Haspels
    Jennifer Ramautar
    Gert Jan van der Wilt
    Matthijs Verhage
    Hilgo Bruining
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [9] Single-case experimental designs for bumetanide across neurodevelopmental disorders: BUDDI protocol
    Geertjens, Lisa
    Cristian, Gianina
    Haspels, Eva
    Ramautar, Jennifer
    van der Wilt, Gert Jan
    Verhage, Matthijs
    Bruining, Hilgo
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide
    Krasny-Pacini, Agata
    Evans, Jonathan
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 61 (03) : 164 - 179