Assurance for Autonomy - JPL's past research, lessons learned, and future directions

被引:1
|
作者
Feather, Martin S. [1 ]
Pinto, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Off Safety & Mission Success, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
assurance; autonomy; testing; validation; verification; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1109/ICAA58325.2023.00022
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Robotic space missions have long depended on automation, defined in the 2015 NASA Technology Roadmaps as "the automatically-controlled operation of an apparatus, process, or system using a pre-planned set of instructions (e.g., a command sequence)," to react to events when a rapid response is required. Autonomy, defined there as "the capacity of a system to achieve goals while operating independently from external control," is required when a wide variation in circumstances precludes responses being pre-planned, instead autonomy follows an on-board deliberative process to determine the situation, decide the response, and manage its execution. Autonomy is increasingly called for to support adventurous space mission concepts, as an enabling capability or as a significant enhancer of the science value that those missions can return. But if autonomy is to be allowed to control these missions' expensive assets, all parties in the lifetime of a mission, from proposers through ground control, must have high confidence that autonomy will perform as intended to keep the asset safe to (if possible) accomplish the mission objectives. The role of mission assurance is a key contributor to providing this confidence, yet assurance practices honed over decades of spaceflight have relatively little experience with autonomy. To remedy this situation, researchers in JPL's software assurance group have been involved in the development of techniques specific to the assurance of autonomy. This paper summarizes over two decades of this research, and offers a vision of where further work is needed to address open issues.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions
    Turner, RK
    Paavola, J
    Cooper, P
    Farber, S
    Jessamy, V
    Georgiou, S
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (03) : 493 - 510
  • [2] LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS
    ELIOT, RS
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1988, 116 (02) : 682 - 686
  • [3] HPC lessons learned and future directions
    Lane, S. N.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE OPTIMIZATION, 2010, : 2909 - 2914
  • [4] COVID-19 and the Heart: Lessons Learned and Future Research Directions
    Lee, Tetz Cheng-Che
    Omar, Alaa Mabrouk Salem
    Bella, Jonathan N.
    CARDIOGENETICS, 2024, 14 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [5] Translating research to practice - Lessons learned, areas for improvement, and future directions
    Glasgow, RE
    DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (08) : 2451 - 2456
  • [6] Spirochaetes: past lessons to future directions
    Cutler, S.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 17 (04) : 481 - 483
  • [7] Past decade of supercapacitor research-Lessons learned for future innovations
    Molahalli, Vandana
    Chaithrashree, K.
    Singh, Muskan Kumari
    Agrawal, Manica
    Krishnan, Syam G.
    Hegde, Gurumurthy
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 70
  • [8] Advances in the field of intranasal oxytocin research: lessons learned and future directions for clinical research
    Quintana, Daniel S.
    Lischke, Alexander
    Grace, Sally
    Scheele, Dirk
    Ma, Yina
    Becker, Benjamin
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 26 (01) : 80 - 91
  • [9] Advances in the field of intranasal oxytocin research: lessons learned and future directions for clinical research
    Daniel S. Quintana
    Alexander Lischke
    Sally Grace
    Dirk Scheele
    Yina Ma
    Benjamin Becker
    Molecular Psychiatry, 2021, 26 : 80 - 91
  • [10] FUTURE DIRECTIONS: LESSONS LEARNED AND NEXT STEPS
    Pynoos, J.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 378 - 378