Overcoming challenges in conducting systematic reviews in implementation science: a methods commentary

被引：6

作者：

Chapman, Anna ^{[1
]}

Rankin, Nicole M. ^{[2
]}

Jongebloed, Hannah ^{[1
]}

Yoong, Sze Lin ^{[3
]}

White, Victoria ^{[4
]}

Livingston, Patricia M. ^{[1
]}

Hutchinson, Alison M. ^{[1
,5
]}

Ugalde, Anna ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Fac Hlth, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res,Sch Nursing & Midwif, Geelong, Vic, Australia

[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Policy, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

[3] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Fac Hlth, Global Ctr Prevent Hlth & Nutr,Sch Hlth & Social D, Geelong, Vic, Australia

[4] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Psychol, Geelong, Vic, Australia

[5] Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia

来源：

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2023年 / 12卷 / 01期

关键词：

Implementation science; Systematic review; Implementation; Dissemination; Knowledge translation;

D O I：

10.1186/s13643-023-02285-3

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Consolidation of the literature using systematic reviews is a critical way to advance a discipline and support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare. However, unique challenges exist that impact the conduct of systematic reviews in implementation science. In this commentary, we reflect on our combined experience to describe five key challenges unique to systematic reviews of primary implementation research. These challenges include (1) descriptors used in implementation science publications, (2) distinction between evidence-based interventions and implementation strategies, (3) assessment of external validity, (4) synthesis of implementation studies with substantial clinical and methodological diversity, and (5) variability in defining implementation 'success'. We outline possible solutions and highlight resources that can be used by authors of primary implementation research, as well as systematic review and editorial teams, to overcome the identified challenges and optimise the utility of future systematic reviews in implementation science.

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] Overcoming challenges in conducting systematic reviews in implementation science: a methods commentary
Anna Chapman
Nicole M. Rankin
Hannah Jongebloed
Sze Lin Yoong
Victoria White
Patricia M. Livingston
Alison M. Hutchinson
Anna Ugalde
[J]. Systematic Reviews, 12
[2] Methods for implementation science systematic reviews
Le Tourneau, Noelle
[J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18
[3] JUGGLING JURISDICTIONS: METHODS FOR CONDUCTING MODULAR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?
Thompson, J.
Hawkins, N.
[J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A614 - A614
[4] There are challenges in conducting systematic reviews in developing countries: the Jamaican experience
Bennett, Nadia R.
Cumberbatch, Chisa
Francis, Damian K.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (09) : 1095 - 1098
[5] Systematic reviews and chemical risk assessment: current challenges and the need for AI in overcoming them
Whaley, P. A.
[J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 350 : S17 - S17
[6] The Automation of Science? Possibilities and Boundaries of AI Applications for Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews
Tomczyk, Przemyslaw
Brueggemann, Philipp
Doligalski, Tymoteusz
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2024,
[7] Methods and interpretation in systematic reviews: Commentary on two parallel reviews of epidural analgesia during labor
Thacker, SB
Stroup, DF
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) : S78 - S80
[8] The science of systematic reviews
Arnold, Donald M.
[J]. TRANSFUSION, 2007, 47 (08) : 1347 - 1349
[9] Quantitative Consensus in Systematic Reviews: Current and Future Challenges in Translational Science
Chiappelli, Francesco
Kasar, Vandan R.
Balenton, Nicole
Khakshooy, Allen
[J]. BIOINFORMATION, 2018, 14 (02) : 86 - 92
[10] EXAMINING GUIDANCE AND KEY PRINCIPLES FOR CONDUCTING LIVING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: A METHODS REVIEW
Diamond, M.
Valbuena-Fajardo, J.
Appiah, K.
Rizzo, M.
[J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S398 - S398

← 1 2 3 4 5 →