An integrated process-based framework for flood phase segmentation and assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Yao, Shuang [1 ]
Du, Wenying [2 ]
Chen, Nengcheng [2 ]
Wang, Chao [1 ]
Chen, Zeqiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & Re, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Natl Engn Res Ctr Geog Informat Syst, Sch Geog & Informat Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Flood process; phase segmentation; flood assessment; ontology; multisource data; DROUGHT INDEXES; PRECIPITATION; RISK; IMPACTS; BASIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/13658816.2023.2181351
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From a process perspective, a flood includes several phases with distinguishable features. Fine-grained multisource data for different flood phases can be used to inform decision-making as flooding progresses. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an integrated framework based on human perceptions to progressively profile floods, including flood process segmentation rules (FPSR), flood severity index (FSI) and flood process perception ontology (FPPO). FPSR identifies flood phases based on specific signals in multisource data and provides spatiotemporal process information to FPPO consistent with flood perception. FSI follows FPSR to evaluate flooding throughout its evolution process. The comparison between FPSR and the flood monitoring index (I-F) demonstrates that FPSR can detect flood events and segment the flooding process into latency, onset, development and recovery phases. The correlations between the standardized antecedent precipitation index (SAPI) and FSI show that FSI can assess flood severity with both natural and social effects in every flooding phase (R-2 = 0.726 and 0.673 for the 2016 and 2020 floods, respectively). An experiment finds that flood events in Wuhan, China, usually begin in mid-to-late June and are the most severe in July, when more caution is needed for flood prevention and mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1337
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Process-Based Flood Risk Assessment for Germany
    Sairam, Nivedita
    Brill, Fabio
    Sieg, Tobias
    Farrag, Mostafa
    Kellermann, Patric
    Viet Dung Nguyen
    Luedtke, Stefan
    Merz, Bruno
    Schroeter, Kai
    Vorogushyn, Sergiy
    Kreibich, Heidi
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [2] Uncertainty assessment of a process-based integrated catchment model of phosphorus
    Sarah Dean
    Jim Freer
    Keith Beven
    Andrew J. Wade
    Dan Butterfield
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2009, 23 : 991 - 1010
  • [3] A process-based assessment framework for technology education: a case study
    van Niekerk, Elsabe
    Ankiewicz, Piet
    de Swardt, Estelle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2010, 20 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [4] A process-based assessment framework for technology education: a case study
    Elsabé van Niekerk
    Piet Ankiewicz
    Estelle de Swardt
    International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2010, 20 : 191 - 215
  • [5] Uncertainty assessment of a process-based integrated catchment model of phosphorus
    Dean, Sarah
    Freer, Jim
    Beven, Keith
    Wade, Andrew J.
    Butterfield, Dan
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2009, 23 (07) : 991 - 1010
  • [6] Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
    Wilson, Charlie
    Guivarch, Celine
    Kriegler, Elmar
    van Ruijven, Bas
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Krey, Volker
    Schwanitz, Valeria Jana
    Thompson, Erica L.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 166 (1-2)
  • [7] Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
    Charlie Wilson
    Céline Guivarch
    Elmar Kriegler
    Bas van Ruijven
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Volker Krey
    Valeria Jana Schwanitz
    Erica L. Thompson
    Climatic Change, 2021, 166
  • [8] Process-based framework for precise neuromodulation
    Lubianiker, Nitzan
    Goldway, Noam
    Fruchtman-Steinbok, Tom
    Paret, Christian
    Keynan, Jacob N.
    Singer, Neomi
    Cohen, Avihay
    Kadosh, Kathrin Cohen
    Linden, David E. J.
    Hendler, Talma
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (05) : 436 - 445
  • [9] Transcending limitations of stationarity and the return period: process-based approach to flood estimation and risk assessment
    Sivapalan, Murugesu
    Samuel, Jos M.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2009, 23 (11) : 1671 - 1675
  • [10] Advancing process-based flood frequency analysis for assessing flood hazard and population flood exposure
    Perez, Gabriel
    Coon, Ethan T.
    Rathore, Saubhagya S.
    Le, Phong V. V.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 639