Widespread exposure of marine parks, whales, and whale sharks to shipping

被引:3
|
作者
Raoult, Vincent [1 ]
Pirotta, Vanessa [2 ]
Gaston, Troy F. [1 ]
Norman, Brad [3 ,4 ]
Reynolds, Samantha [3 ,5 ]
Smith, Tim M. [1 ]
Double, Mike [6 ]
How, Jason [7 ]
Hayward, Matt W. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Ourimbah, NSW 2250, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Marine Predator Res Grp, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[3] ECOCEAN Inc, 439 Rapids Rd, Serpentine, WA 6125, Australia
[4] Murdoch Univ, Harry Butler Inst, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[6] Australian Antarctic Div, Australian Marine Mammal Ctr, Kingston, Tas 7050, Australia
[7] Dept Primary Ind & Reg Dev, Perth, WA, Australia
[8] Univ Newcastle, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[9] Univ Pretoria, Ctr Invas Biol, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
acoustic pollution; AIS; marine parks; satellite tag; shark; ship strikes; shipping; whale; PROTECTED AREAS; NOISE; IMPACTS; OCEAN; SPILLOVER; MORTALITY; FISH;
D O I
10.1071/MF22050
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Context. Shipping impacts are a major environmental concern that can affect the behaviour and health of marine mammals and fishes. The potential impacts of shipping within marine parks is rarely considered during the planning process. Aims. We assessed the areal disturbance footprint of shipping around Australia, its overlap with marine parks, and known locations of megafauna, so as to identify areas of concern that warrant further investigation. Methods. Automatic Identification System (AIS) shipping data from 2018 to 2021 were interpreted through a kernel-density distribution and compared with satellite data from & SIM;200 individuals of megafauna amalgamated from 2003 to 2018, and the locations of marine parks. Key results. Over 18% of marine parks had shipping exposure in excess of 365 vessels per year. Around all of Australia, 39% of satellite-tag reports from whale shark and 36.7% of pygmy blue and humpback whale satellite-tag reports were in moderate shipping-exposure areas (> 90 ships per year). Shipping exposure significantly increased from 2018 despite the pandemic, including within marine parks. Conclusions. These results highlight the wide-scale footprint of commercial shipping on marine ecosystems that may be increasing in intensity over time.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 85
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Marine parks need sharks?
    Chapman, DDF
    Pikitch, EK
    Babcock, EA
    SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5773) : 526 - 527
  • [2] Marine parks need sharks? Response
    Mumby, PJ
    Micheli, F
    Dahlgren, CP
    Litvin, SY
    Gill, AB
    Brumbaugh, DR
    Broad, K
    Sanchirico, JN
    Kappel, CV
    Harborne, AR
    Holmes, KE
    SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5773) : 527 - 528
  • [3] Whale sharks in Ningaloo Marine Park: managing tourism in an Australian marine protected area
    Davis, D
    Banks, S
    Birtles, A
    Valentine, P
    Cuthill, M
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 18 (05) : 259 - 271
  • [4] Marine biology Turns out whale sharks really are pretty long in the tooth
    Le Page, Michael
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2020, 245 (3278) : 19 - 19
  • [5] Parks for sharks: human exclusion areas outperform no-take marine reserves
    Frisch, Ashley J.
    Rizzari, Justin R.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [6] Successful parks for sharks: No-take marine reserve provides conservation benefits to endemic and threatened sharks off South Africa
    Albano, Patricia S.
    Fallows, Chris
    Fallows, Monique
    Schuitema, Olivia
    Bernard, Anthony T. F.
    Sedgwick, Oliver
    Hammerschlag, Neil
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 261
  • [7] Noise exposure from commercial shipping for the southern resident killer whale population
    Cominelli, Simone
    Devillers, Rodolphe
    Yurk, Harald
    MacGillivray, Alexander
    McWhinnie, Lauren
    Canessa, Rosaline
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2018, 136 : 177 - 200
  • [8] Sharks as exfoliators: widespread chafing between marine organisms suggests an unexplored ecological role
    Williams, Lacey H.
    Anstett, Alexandra
    Munoz, Victor Bach
    Chisholm, John
    Fallows, Chris
    Green, Jonathan R.
    Rivas, Jesus Erick Higuera
    Skomal, Gregory
    Winton, Megan
    Hammerschlag, Neil
    ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (01)
  • [9] Exposure to whale watching vessels affects dive ascents and resting behavior in sperm whales
    Oliveira, Claudia
    Perez-Jorge, Sergi
    Prieto, Rui
    Cascao, Irma
    Wensveen, Paul J.
    Silva, Monica A.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [10] Swatch-of-no-ground marine protected area for sharks, dolphins, porpoises and whales: Legal and institutional challenges
    Karim, Md Saiful
    Uddin, Md Mahatab
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2019, 139 : 275 - 281