MITE infestation accommodated by genome editing in the germline genome of the ciliate Blepharisma

被引:1
|
作者
Seah, Brandon K. B. [1 ]
Singh, Minakshi [1 ]
Emmerich, Christiane [1 ]
Singh, Aditi [1 ]
Woehle, Christian [2 ]
Huettel, Bruno [2 ]
Byerly, Adam [3 ]
Stover, Naomi A. [4 ]
Sugiura, Mayumi [5 ]
Harumoto, Terue [5 ]
Swart, Estienne C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biol, D-72072 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Plant Breeding, Max Planck Genome Ctr Cologne, D-50829 Cologne, Germany
[3] Bradley Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Peoria, IL 61625 USA
[4] Bradley Univ, Dept Biol, Peoria, IL 61625 USA
[5] Nara Womens Univ, Dept Chem Biol & Environm Sci, Nara 6308506, Japan
关键词
DNA elimination; mobile element; selfish gene; micronucleus; macronucleus; CONJUGATION-INDUCING GLYCOPROTEIN; REPEAT TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; DICER-LIKE PROTEIN; DNA METHYLATION; SMALL RNAS; SEQUENCE; TETRAHYMENA; REARRANGEMENT; GENE; ELIMINATION;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2213985120
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
During their development following sexual conjugation, ciliates excise numerous internal eliminated sequences (IESs) from a copy of the germline genome to produce the functional somatic genome. Most IESs are thought to have originated from transposons, but the presumed homology is often obscured by sequence decay. To obtain more representative perspectives on the nature of IESs and ciliate genome editing, we assembled 40,000 IESs of Blepharisma stoltei, a species belonging to a lineage (Heterotrichea) that diverged early from those of the intensively studied model ciliate species. About a quarter of IESs were short (<115 bp), largely nonrepetitive, and with a pronounced similar to 10 bp periodicity in length; the remainder were longer (up to 7 kbp) and nonperiodic and contained abundant interspersed repeats. Contrary to the expectation from current models, the assembled Blepharisma germline genome encodes few transposases. Instead, its most abundant repeat (8,000 copies) is a Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Element (MITE), apparently a deletion derivative of a germline-limited Pogo-family transposon. We hypothesize that MITEs are an important source of IESs whose proliferation is eventually self-limiting and that rather than defending the germline genomes against mobile elements, transposase domestication actually facilitates the accumulation of junk DNA.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Origins of genome-editing excisases as illuminated by the somatic genome of the ciliate Blepharisma
    Singh, Minakshi
    Seah, Brandon K. B.
    Emmerich, Christiane
    Singh, Aditi
    Woehle, Christian
    Huettel, Bruno
    Byerly, Adam
    Stover, Naomi A.
    Sugiura, Mayumi
    Harumoto, Terue
    Swart, Estienne C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (04)
  • [2] Human Germline Genome Editing
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Mortlock, Douglas P.
    Scholes, Derek T.
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Brody, Lawrence C.
    Faucett, W. Andrew
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Hercher, Laura
    Isasi, Rosario
    Middleton, Anna
    Musunuru, Kiran
    Shriner, Daniel
    Virani, Alice
    Young, Caroline E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2017, 101 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [3] Human germline genome editing
    Rebecca A. Lea
    Kathy K. Niakan
    [J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2019, 21 : 1479 - 1489
  • [4] Human germline genome editing
    Lea, Rebecca A.
    Niakan, Kathy K.
    [J]. NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2019, 21 (12) : 1479 - 1489
  • [5] Genome Editing of the Germline: Broadening the Discussion
    Porteus, Matthew H.
    Dann, Christina T.
    [J]. MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2015, 23 (06) : 979 - 981
  • [6] Germline Genome Editing and the Functions of Consent
    Ranisch, Robert
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2017, 17 (12): : 27 - 29
  • [7] Human Germline Genome Editing: An Assessment
    Greely, Henry T.
    [J]. CRISPR JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (05): : 253 - 265
  • [8] Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit
    Sparrow, Robert
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (09): : 4 - 15
  • [9] Opinion on Interventions in the Germ Line-Genome (Germline Genome Editing)
    [J]. MEDIZINISCHE GENETIK, 2018, 30 (01): : 70 - 71
  • [10] Democratic Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing
    Jasanoff, Sheila
    Hurlbut, J. Benjamin
    Saha, Krishanu
    [J]. CRISPR JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (05): : 266 - 271