Dicamba off-target movement from applications on soybeans at two growth stages

被引:1
|
作者
Kruger, Greg R. [1 ]
Alves, Guilherme S. [1 ]
Schroeder, Kasey [1 ]
Golus, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Reynolds, Daniel B. [2 ]
Dodds, Darrin M. [2 ,5 ]
Brown, Ashli E. [3 ]
Fritz, Bradley K. [4 ]
Hoffmann, Wesley C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agron & Hort, North Platte, NE USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Div Agr Forestry & Vet Med, Mississippi State, MS USA
[4] USDA ARS, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
SPRAY DRIFT; VOLATILITY; GLYPHOSATE; INJURY; RATES; HERBICIDES; MISSOURI; MODEL; 2,4-D;
D O I
10.1002/agg2.20363
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate dicamba off-target movement during and after applications over soybean at two growth stages. Dicamba-tolerant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] at V3 and R1 growth stages in Nebraska and Mississippi fields were treated with diglycolamine salt of dicamba (560 g ae ha(-1)), potassium salt of glyphosate (1260 g ae ha(-1)), and a drift-reducing adjuvant (0.5% v v(-1)). Filter papers positioned outside the sprayed area were used to determine primary movement and air samplers positioned at the center of sprayed area were used to calculate dicamba flux from 0.5 up to 68 hours after application (HAA). Flux was calculated using the aerodynamic method. Soybean growth stage did not affect dicamba deposition on filter papers from 8 to 45 m downwind from the sprayed areas. At 33 m downwind (i.e., distance of the labeled buffer zone), a spray drift of less than 0.0091% (0.05 g ae ha(-1)) of applied rate is estimated. Dicamba secondary movement may not be affected by soybean growth stage during the application. Although dicamba was detected in air samples collected at 68 HAA, the majority of the secondary movement was observed in the first 24 HAA. Dicamba cumulative loss was lower than 0.77% of applied rate. Results suggest the more stable the atmospheric conditions, the higher the dicamba flux. Thus, meteorological conditions after applications must be considered, and tools to predict the occurrence of temperature inversion are needed to minimize secondary movement of dicamba.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Off-target Movement of Dicamba Herbicide to Sweetpotato at Different Growth Stages
    Shankle, Mark W.
    Meyers, Stephen L.
    Garrett, Trevor F.
    Main, Jeffery L.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S407 - S407
  • [2] Analytical methods to quantify off-target movement of dicamba
    Riter, Leah
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [3] Evaluating spatial scale effects of dicamba applications on off-target vapor movement
    Orr, Tom
    Pai, Naresh
    Sall, Erik
    DesAutels, Christopher
    Popovic, Jelena
    Reiss, Richard
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [4] Off-target movement assessment of dicamba in North America
    Soltani, Nader
    Oliveira, Maxwel C.
    Alves, Guilherme S.
    Werle, Rodrigo
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Sprague, Christy L.
    Young, Bryan G.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Brown, Ashli
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 318 - 330
  • [5] Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean
    Jones, Gordon T.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Barber, Tom
    Gbur, Edward
    Kruger, Greg R.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 51 - 65
  • [6] Sensitivity of Potato, Tomato, and Watermelon to Off-Target Movement of Dicamba
    Rice, Timothy
    Henry, Jerri Lynn
    Smeda, Reid J.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2021, 56 (09) : S251 - S251
  • [7] Identification of environmental factors that influence the likelihood of off-target movement of dicamba
    Oseland, Eric
    Bish, Mandy
    Steckel, Larry
    Bradley, Kevin
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 76 (09) : 3282 - 3291
  • [8] Analysis of weather and environmental factors associated with off-target dicamba movement
    Bish, Mandy
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [9] Conversations about the Future of Dicamba: The Science Behind Off-Target Movement
    Riter, Leah S.
    Pai, Naresh
    Vieira, Bruno C.
    MacInnes, Alison
    Reiss, Richard
    Hapeman, Cathleen J.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2021, 69 (48) : 14435 - 14444
  • [10] Survey of Nebraska Farmer's Adoption of Dicamba-Resistant Soybean Technology and Dicamba Off-Target Movement
    Werle, Rodrigo
    Oliveira, Maxwel C.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    Proctor, Christopher A.
    Rees, Jennifer
    Klein, Robert
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 754 - 761