Complications of different methods of urological management in people with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between multiple types of urological management and urological complications in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingSingle medical center.MethodsMedical records of SCI patients with regular follow-up of more than two years were reviewed. Urological management was classified into five groups: indwelling urethral catheter (IUC), clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), reflex voiding, suprapubic catheter (SPC), and self-voiding. We analyzed the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI), epididymitis, hydronephrosis, and renal stone across the different urological-management groups.ResultsOf 207 individuals with SCI, the most common management type was self-voiding (n = 65, 31%) followed by CIC (n = 47, 23%). The IUC and SPC groups included more people with complete SCI than the other management groups. Compared with the IUC group, the SPC and self-voiding groups had lower risks of developing UTI (relative risk [RR] = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59-0.97 and RR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.28-0.55, respectively). The SPC group tended to have a lower risk of epididymitis than the IUC group (RR = 0.55, 95% CI, 0.18-1.63).ConclusionLong-term IUC use was associated with a higher incidence of UTI in people with SCI. As compared to those with IUC, a lower risk of UTI was found in persons with SPC. These findings may have implications for shared clinical decision-making.