Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup

被引:6
|
作者
Ticconi, Carlo [1 ]
Nicastri, Elena [1 ]
D'Ippolito, Silvia [2 ,3 ]
Chiaramonte, Carlo [4 ]
Pietropolli, Adalgisa [1 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [3 ,5 ]
Di Simone, Nicoletta [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tor Vergata, Dept Surg Sci, Sect Gynecol & Obstet, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & San Pubbl, UOC Ostetricia & Patol Ostetr, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ist Clin Ostetr & Ginecol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Viale Oxford 81, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[5] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & San Pubbl, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[6] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Via R Levi Montalcini 4, I-20072 Milan, Italy
[7] IRCCS, Human Clin & Res Ctr, Via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Milan, Italy
关键词
Recurrent pregnancy loss; Diagnostic factors; Risk factors; Pregnancy complications; CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS; CONSENSUS; WOMEN; MISCARRIAGE; PREDICTION; COUPLES;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
PurposeThere is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).MethodsIn this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories.ResultsThe rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus >= 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age >= 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age >= 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma.ConclusionA patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 142
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
    Carlo Ticconi
    Elena Nicastri
    Silvia D’Ippolito
    Carlo Chiaramonte
    Adalgisa Pietropolli
    Giovanni Scambia
    Nicoletta Di Simone
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 : 127 - 142
  • [2] The Importance of an Evidence-based Workup for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
    Gibbins, Karen J.
    Porter, T. Flint
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (03): : 456 - 463
  • [3] Diagnostic workup of endocrine dysfunction in recurrent pregnancy loss: a cross-sectional study in Northeast China
    Zhang, Liyang
    Du, Yushu
    Zhou, Jingshuang
    Li, Jiapo
    Shen, Hongfei
    Liu, Yilin
    Liu, Chuanyang
    Qiao, Chong
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [4] Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    Van Diik, M.
    Kolte, A.
    Limpens, J.
    Kirk, E.
    Quenby, S.
    Van Wely, M.
    Goddijn, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 91 - 92
  • [5] Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    van Dijk, Myrthe M.
    Kolte, Astrid M.
    Limpens, Jacqueline
    Kirk, Emma
    Quenby, Siobhan
    van Wely, Madelon
    Goddijn, Mariette
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2020, 26 (03) : 356 - 367
  • [6] Anatomic factors in recurrent pregnancy loss
    Wold, Anne S. Devi
    Pham, Norma
    Arici, Aydin
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 24 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [7] Genetic factors in recurrent pregnancy loss
    Ward, KJ
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (04) : 425 - 432
  • [8] Simplifying the diagnostic workup of molar pregnancy
    Knowles, LM
    Drake, RD
    Ashfaq, R
    Miller, DS
    Schorge, JO
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 118S - 118S
  • [9] Diagnostic and treatment strategies in recurrent early pregnancy loss
    Toth, B.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 81 (02) : 121 - 121
  • [10] Recurrent pregnancy loss: Risk factors and management
    Vintzileos, A
    PERINATAL MEDICINE OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2001, : 1324 - 1326