Food security and environmental degradation: Do institutional quality and human capital make a difference?

被引:24
|
作者
Ashraf, Junaid [1 ]
Javed, Aiman [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Food security; Environmental degradation; Institutional quality; Human capital;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117330
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The nexus between food security (FS), institutional quality (IQ), human capital (HC), and environmental deterioration (ED) has important implications for ecological sustainability. Yet, environmental deterioration resulting from food security activities is a widely ignored topic, particularly in BRI countries. To address this gap, we examined the influence of food security, human capital and institutional quality on the environmental deterioration of BRI countries from 1984 to 2019. Furthermore, it investigates the moderating effect of insti-tutional quality and human capital on ED. The empirical findings revealed that food security increases ED. The research also revealed that HC and IQ lower the ED. Furthermore, food security promotes ecological sustain -ability through the HC channel. Additionally, institutional quality decreases the negative environmental impli-cations of food security. Based on these results, BRI nations should enhance ecological sustainability by investing in HC and using food resources efficiently.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference?
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Yang, Xiyue
    Hussain, Nazim
    Sinha, Avik
    [J]. GONDWANA RESEARCH, 2022, 105 : 299 - 310
  • [2] Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations?
    Mehmood, Usman
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (25) : 38017 - 38025
  • [3] Retraction Note: Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations?
    Usman Mehmood
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (33) : 46103 - 46103
  • [4] A step towards environmental mitigation: Do green technological innovation and institutional quality make a difference?
    Amin, Nabila
    Shabbir, Muhammad Salman
    Song, Huaming
    Farrukh, Muhammad Umar
    Iqbal, Shahid
    Abbass, Kashif
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 190
  • [5] Enhancing food security in sub-Saharan Africa: Investigating the role of environmental degradation, food prices, and institutional quality
    Abdi, Abdikafi Hassan
    Mohamed, Abdisalan Aden
    Mohamed, Farhia Hassan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2024, 17
  • [6] INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY AND FOOD SECURITY
    Subramaniam, Yogeeswari
    Masron, Tajul Ariffin
    Subramaniam, Thirunaukarasu
    [J]. SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 67 (06): : 2099 - 2127
  • [7] The Implications of Food Security on Sustainability: Do Trade Facilitation, Population Growth, and Institutional Quality Make or Mar the Target for SSA?
    Ibrahim, Ridwan Lanre
    Al-Mulali, Usama
    Ajide, Kazeem Bello
    Mohammed, Abubakar
    Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [8] Do 'quality' programs make a difference?
    Anon
    [J]. INFORM - International News on Fats, Oils and Related Materials, 2002, 13 (01):
  • [9] Bacteria as food in aquaculture: do they make a difference?
    Nevejan, Nancy
    De Schryver, Peter
    Wille, Mathieu
    Dierckens, Kristof
    Baruah, Kartik
    Van Stappen, Gilbert
    [J]. REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2018, 10 (01) : 180 - 212
  • [10] An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference?
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Majeed, Abdul
    Huang, Bo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 89