Artificial intelligence-generated patient information leaflets: a comparison of contents according to British Association of Dermatologists standards

被引:0
|
作者
Verran, Callum [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ced/llad461
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Patient information leaflets (PILs) can supplement a clinical consultation and provide additional information for a patient to read in their own time. The objectives of this study were to determine whether artificical intelligence (AI) can produce PILs that include a similar degree of content to current British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) PILs using ChatGPT. AI-generated PILs were found to include similar factual content to BAD PILs but excluded information that was felt to be more pertinent to patient concerns such as curability and heritability. AI-generated PILs were produced at a reading age beyond that of a large number of UK adults. Caution is advised regarding medication-specific PILs. Background Patient information leaflets (PILs) can supplement a clinical consultation and provide additional information for a patient to read in their own time. A wide range of PILs are available for distribution by the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and undergo rigorous review ahead of publication. In the UK, 7.1 million adults are estimated to have the reading age of a 9-year-old child and 43% are unable to comprehend written health information.Objectives To determine whether artificial intelligence (AI) can produce PILs that include a similar degree of content to current BAD PILs.Methods Using the AI tool ChatGPT, 10 PILs were generated, and their contents compared with those of existing BAD PILs using an author-generated list of commonly included themes. Omissions were noted and a repeat series of PILs generated using targeted request phrasing. The readability of AI-generated PILs was also analysed.Results AI-generated PILs were found to include similar factual content to BAD PILs but excluded information that was felt to be more pertinent to patient concerns such as curability and heritability. Targeted request phrasing saw AI generate PILs including this content. The readability of AI-generated PILs was beyond that of a large number of UK adults.Conclusions Where a condition-specific PIL is not readily available, an AI-generated PIL can provide relevant information of lesser quality than existing BAD PILs, which may be inaccessible to some patients. Specific caution is advised regarding AI-generated medication-specific PILs.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Readability assessment of the British Association of Dermatologists' patient information leaflets
    Hunt, W. T. N.
    Sofela, J.
    Mustapa, M. F. Mohd
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 47 (04) : 684 - 691
  • [2] Synthetic Realities and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Contents
    Moreira, Daniel
    Marcel, Sebastien
    Rocha, Anderson
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2024, 22 (03) : 7 - 10
  • [3] Analyzing and Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-Generated Contents
    Mondal, Himel
    Mondal, Shaikat
    Podder, Indrasish
    [J]. INDIAN DERMATOLOGY ONLINE JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (01) : 164 - 165
  • [4] Synthetic Realities and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Contents
    Moreira, Daniel
    Marcel, Sebastien
    Rocha, Anderson
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2024, 22 (04) : 101 - 102
  • [5] Validating Artificial Intelligence Generated Patient Information Leaflets: A Patient Survey
    Spinos, D.
    Okonkwo, O.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence-Generated Draft Replies to Patient Inbox Messages
    Garcia, Patricia
    Ma, Stephen P.
    Shah, Shreya
    Smith, Margaret
    Jeong, Yejin
    Devon-Sand, Anna
    Tai-Seale, Ming
    Takazawa, Kevin
    Clutter, Danyelle
    Vogt, Kyle
    Lugtu, Carlene
    Rojo, Matthew
    Lin, Steven
    Shanafelt, Tait
    Pfeffer, Michael A.
    Sharp, Christopher
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (03)
  • [7] Assessing the quality of artificial intelligence-generated patient counseling for rhinosinusitis
    Hill, Gregory S.
    Fischer, Jakob L.
    Watson, Nora L.
    Riley, Charles A.
    Tolisano, Anthony M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2024,
  • [8] Evaluation of Online Artificial Intelligence-Generated Information on Common Hand Procedures
    Crook, Bryan S.
    Park, Caroline N.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Richard, Marc J.
    Pidgeon, Tyler S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 48 (11): : 1122 - 1127
  • [9] Assessing Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Urology Patient In-Basket Messages
    Scott, Michael
    Muncey, Wade
    Seranio, Nicolas
    Belladelli, Federico
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Li, Shufeng
    Ha, Albert
    Glover, Frank
    Zhang, Chiyuan Amy
    Eisenberg, Michael L.
    [J]. UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2024, 11 (05)
  • [10] Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information
    Berry, Charlotte E.
    Fazilat, Alexander Z.
    Lavin, Christopher
    Lintel, Hendrik
    Cole, Naomi
    Stingl, Cybil S.
    Valencia, Caleb
    Morgan, Annah G.
    Momeni, Arash
    Wan, Derrick C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2024,