PROTOCOL: Assessment of publication time in Campbell systematic reviews: A cross-sectional survey

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Ge, Long [2 ]
Wei, Zhipeng [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Liangying [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Honghao [2 ]
Yang, Kehu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Social Sci Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1002/cl2.1303
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. This study has three main objectives: (1) To examine the time duration from title registration to publication of the protocol for a Campbell systematic review and publication of the completed Campbell systematic review; (2) To describe publication times in accordance with the characteristics of the reviews, which include year of publication, type of review, number of authors, number of collaborative institutions, the time gap between the date the search was conducted and review publication, and the length and complexity of the included review (including the number of pages, the number of tables and figures, the number of studies included in the review, the number and type of analyses undertaken, and the number of references); (3) To describe the differences in publication times between Campbell Review Groups.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic literature reviews in oncology: A cross-sectional analysis of ambiguity in publication practice
    Jones, Carole
    Fowler, Robyn
    Lula, Sadiq
    McCracken, Rebecca
    Smoyer, Karen
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 : S18 - S18
  • [2] Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
    Piehl, JH
    Green, S
    McDonald, S
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2003, 3 (1)
  • [3] Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
    Janet H Piehl
    Sally Green
    Steve McDonald
    BMC Health Services Research, 3
  • [4] Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
    Petkovic, Jennifer
    Trawin, Jessica
    Dewidar, Omar
    Yoganathan, Manosila
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welch, Vivian
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [5] Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
    Jennifer Petkovic
    Jessica Trawin
    Omar Dewidar
    Manosila Yoganathan
    Peter Tugwell
    Vivian Welch
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [6] Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey
    Reint Meursinge Reynders
    Luisa Ladu
    Nicola Di Girolamo
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [7] Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey
    Reynders, Reint Meursinge
    Ladu, Luisa
    Di Girolamo, Nicola
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6 : 249
  • [8] Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study
    Pauline A. J. Steegmans
    Shandra Bipat
    Reint A. Meursinge Reynders
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [9] Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study
    Steegmans, Pauline A. J.
    Bipat, Shandra
    Reynders, Reint A. Meursinge
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [10] Methodological quality for systematic reviews of adverse events with surgical interventions: a cross-sectional survey
    Zhou, Xiaoqin
    Li, Linji
    Lin, Lifeng
    Ju, Ke
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Xu, Chang
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)