Assessing Religious Leadership: A Scoping Review of Leadership Effectiveness Criteria and Current Trends in the Academic Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Foppen, Annemarie [1 ]
van Saane, Joke W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Relig & Theol, Dept Beliefs & Practices, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Humanist Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Religious leadership; Scoping review; Effectiveness criteria; Assessment; Clergy; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; CLERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11089-023-01113-8
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A clear understanding of what constitutes effective religious leadership in the context of faith communities is essential for religious practitioners, religious communities, and educational institutes. Twenty-five years after the latest review study by Nauss, an updated overview is needed to account for new insights, especially regarding the latest developments in leadership research and the changing religious landscape. A scoping review was conducted in four databases from 1997 to 2022 to examine the academic literature. The search identified 64 unique references that researched effective religious leadership using 27 different effectiveness criteria. These criteria were categorized based on their target of evaluation: (1) the religious leader, (2) followers/members, and (3) the congregation. Although most references assessed leadership effectiveness by evaluating the religious leader, the most used effectiveness criterion was 'attendance or numerical growth.' Over the last 25 years, the criteria for religious leadership effectiveness have become more diverse, and a growing number of references combine criteria from multiple targets to evaluate effectiveness. However, the focus on Christian leadership remains prevalent in the academic literature. The present overview is intended as a starting point for future research as it identifies the current trends and existing knowledge gaps. The study's findings also invite religious practitioners and congregations to reflect on their methods of assessing leadership effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing Religious Leadership: A Scoping Review of Leadership Effectiveness Criteria and Current Trends in the Academic Literature
    Annemarie Foppen
    Joke W. van Saane
    [J]. Pastoral Psychology, 2024, 73 : 1 - 21
  • [2] A Scoping Review of the Literature on Teacher Leadership in Spain
    Tintore, Mireia
    Gratacos, Gloria
    Ladron de Guevara, Begona
    [J]. LEADERSHIP AND POLICY IN SCHOOLS, 2024, 23 (03) : 711 - 729
  • [3] Transformation and Transformational Leadership: A Review of the Current and Relevant Literature for Academic Radiologists
    Thomson, Norman B., III
    Rawson, James V.
    Slade, Catherine P.
    Bledsoe, Martin
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (05) : 592 - 599
  • [4] PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Hardianto
    Hidayat
    Zulkifli
    Setiawan, Muhammad Nurhsyam Ali
    [J]. REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL EJERCICIO Y EL DEPORTE, 2023, 18 (05): : 602 - 606
  • [5] Assessing Veterinary Academic Leadership
    Baker, Henry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 37 (03) : 209 - 209
  • [7] A scoping review on the use and effectiveness of leadership coaching in succession planning
    Sherrer, Morgan
    Rezania, Davar
    [J]. COACHING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 13 (02) : 209 - 219
  • [8] Leadership and physiotherapy: A scoping review
    Ferrando-Margeli, Mercedes
    Suarez-Serrano, Carmen
    Garay-Sanchez, Aitor
    Marcen-Roman, Yolanda
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (11)
  • [9] Distributed Leadership: A Scoping Review Mapping Current Empirical Research
    Hickey, Niamh
    Flaherty, Aishling
    Mannix McNamara, Patricia
    [J]. SOCIETIES, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [10] Unsubstantiated Conclusions: A Scoping Review on Generational Differences of Leadership in Academic Libraries
    Heyns, Erla P.
    Eldermire, Erin R. B.
    Howard, Heather A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2019, 45 (05):