BPM promotion framework for startups: developing dynamic capabilities

被引:1
|
作者
Almeida de Souza Santos, Ana Augusta [1 ]
Dallavalle de Padua, Silvia Ines [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Mato Grosso, Sinop, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Econ Business & Accountancy Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic capability; Start-up; BPM promotion; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; STRATEGY; INNOVATION; UPS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0727
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeStart-ups can change the direction of a country's economy when they manage to remain in the market, as they are companies that generate innovation, income and employment. However, these are companies that need both favorable external conditions that guarantee their survival, and internal capacities for the development of a management that is able to consider the needs for change in the product or service and consolidate the business as a whole. Therefore, start-ups need to develop dynamic capabilities (DCs), which are achieved through the processes that direct, coordinate and formulate the strategies of the other processes. Therefore, adopting a management approach that enables the development of DCs is essential for the survival of start-ups. The business process management (BPM) approach becomes an appropriate option, since it identifies business processes to adapt organizational management to new market demands. It can be used to interpret the environment, to understand the organization internally and to transform; it is flexible to the needs and characteristics of each organization. Based on this, the objective of the study is to develop a BPM framework that operationalizes the development of DCs in start-ups.Design/methodology/approachThe method used consisted of two case studies and analysis of documents and seven interviews. Two start-ups that underwent BPM promotion in 2018 and 2020 were selected. The start-ups are Brazilian and from the biotechnology sector. Interviews were conducted with the team that promoted BPM at start-ups and with members of the start-ups that participated in the promotion. The interviews followed a semi-structured script elaborated according to the authors of the literature review. Discourse analysis was used to identify excerpts from the statements that expressed the content of the questions. All interviews were recorded with the prior consent of the participants and later validated with them.FindingsThe BPM promotion framework for start-ups is divided into four steps: "frame BPM," "understand BPM," "enable BPM" and "continue BPM". Nine principles constitute the promotion of BPM: (1) context consideration principle, (2) holistic, (3) simplicity, (4) involvement, (5) empowerment, (6) shared understanding, (7) purpose, (8) technological appropriation and (9) continuity. Promoting BPM in start-ups has developed dynamic entrepreneurial and networking capabilities.Social implicationsAs for the contribution to society, scientific studies make it possible to structure tacit knowledge and give direction to human action based on assertive methods; thus, the scientific contribution on DCs and start-ups brings assertiveness to start-up managers and the entire chain they impact with their actions, which makes their performance more beneficial to society.Originality/valueAs for the contribution to the state-of-the-art, visualizing the principles in a practical way, through the application of the BPM promotion project in start-ups, made it possible to understand the BPM cycle in a less rigid and more fluid way. This format proved to be suitable for the start-ups in the case study, as it ensured that they learned both about how the approach works and about the advantages of using it in the management of start-ups, thus contributing to the development of these important organizations for the economy of different countries.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 158
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resources and dynamic capabilities in startups
    Usirono, Carlos Hiroshi
    Paiva, Ely Laureano
    Partyka, Raul Beal
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [2] Dynamic framework of performance assessment for startups
    Antunes, Luiz Guilherme Rodrigues
    Vasconcelos, Fernando Freire
    de Oliveira, Camila Maria
    Correa, Hamilton Luiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 71 (07) : 2723 - 2742
  • [3] New perspectives for dynamic capabilities in meeting needs of startups' survival
    Pigola, Angelica
    da Costa, Priscila Rezende
    van der Poel, Naiche
    Yamacake, Franklin Thiago Ribeiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2023, 15 (05) : 1163 - 1193
  • [4] A FRAMEWORK FOR IDENTIFICATION OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES
    Mohammadi, Hanieh
    Mashayekhi, Ali N.
    Arasti, Mohammadreza
    [J]. 5TH ANNUAL EUROMED CONFERENCE OF THE EUROMED ACADEMY OF BUSINESS: BUILDING NEW BUSINESS MODELS FOR SUCCESS THROUGH COMPETITIVENESS AND RESPONSIBILITY, 2013, : 1822 - 1822
  • [5] How business accelerators foster startups' dynamic capabilities: A case study
    Polo Garcia-Ochoa, Celia
    [J]. ESIC MARKET, 2020, 51 (01): : 19 - 43
  • [6] Developing Dynamic IT Capabilities - A Systems Perspective
    Campbell, Bruce
    [J]. BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION THROUGH INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 793 - 804
  • [7] Developing IT-enabled Innovation Capabilities: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach
    Mikalef, Patrick
    [J]. AMCIS 2016 PROCEEDINGS, 2016,
  • [8] THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES IN DEVELOPING INNOVATION-RELATED CAPABILITIES
    Ellonen, Hanna-Kaisa
    Jantunen, Ari
    Kuivalainen, Olli
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 15 (03) : 459 - 478
  • [9] Dynamic capabilities: towards an organizing framework
    Mohamud, Mubarak
    Sarpong, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 9 (04) : 511 - 526
  • [10] Developing a Framework for Maturing IT Risk Management Capabilities
    Carcary, Marian
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2012, : 33 - 40