Imaginaries of omniscience: Automating intelligence in the US Department of Defense

被引:24
|
作者
Suchman, Lucy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Anthropol Sci & Technol, Lancaster, England
关键词
militarism; data; closed world; military technologies; imaginaries;
D O I
10.1177/03063127221104938
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
The current reanimation of artificial intelligence includes a resurgence of investment in automating military intelligence on the part of the US Department of Defense. A series of programs set forth a technopolitical imaginary of fully integrated, comprehensive and real-time 'situational awareness' across US theaters of operation. Locating this imaginary within the history of 'closed world' discourse, I offer a critical reading of dominant scholarship within military circles that sets out the military's cybernetic model of situational awareness in the form of the widely referenced Observe, Orient, Decide, Act or OODA Loop. I argue that the loop's promise of dynamic homeostasis is held in place by the enduring premise of objectivist knowledge, enabled through a war apparatus that treats the contingencies and ambiguities of relations on the ground as noise from which a stable and unambiguous signal can be extracted. In contrast, recent challenges to the closed-world imaginary, based on critical scholarship and investigative journalism, suggest that the aspiration to closure is an engine for the continued destructiveness of US interventions and the associated regeneration of enmity. To challenge these technopolitics of violence we need a radically different kind of situational awareness, one that recognizes the place of ignorance in perpetuating the project of militarism. Only that kind of awareness can inform the public debate required to re-envision a future place for the US in the world, founded in alternative investments in demilitarization and commitments to our collective security.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 786
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] The coherence of Omniscience: A defense
    John E. Abbruzzese
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 1997, 41 : 25 - 34
  • [3] The coherence of omniscience: A defense
    Abbruzzese, JE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, 1997, 41 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [4] SBIR mills and the US Department of Defense
    Link, Albert N.
    Swann, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2024, 49 (06): : 2306 - 2335
  • [5] Public support for research in artificial intelligence: a descriptive study of US Department of Defense SBIR Projects
    Chowdhury, Farhat
    Link, Albert N.
    van Hasselt, Martijn
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2022, 47 (03): : 762 - 774
  • [6] US Defense Innovation and Artificial Intelligence
    Mori, Satoru
    ASIA-PACIFIC REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) : 16 - 44
  • [7] PACS: Implementation in the US department of defense.
    Chacko, AK
    Wider, R
    Romlein, J
    Cawthon, MA
    Richardson, RR
    Lollar, HW
    Cook, JF
    Timboe, HL
    Johnson, TG
    Fellows, DW
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PACS DESIGN AND EVALUATION - ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ISSUES, 2000, 3980 : 139 - 146
  • [8] US Department of Defense Visual Information Lifecycle
    Alexander, April
    ARCHIVING 2016: FINAL PROGRAM AND PROCEEDINGS, 2016, : 54 - 60
  • [9] US Department of Defense contributions to malaria surveillance
    Saunders, David
    Duplessis, Christopher
    Lescano, Andres
    Ben Andagalu
    Thomas, Alumna
    Fukuda, Mark
    Cummings, James
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13 (04): : 293 - 294
  • [10] SEMICONDUCTOR RELIABILITY WITHIN US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    VACCARO, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1974, 62 (02) : 169 - 184