The tunnel model tests of material development in different surrounding rock grades and the force laws in whole excavation-support processes

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Zhi [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jinkun [3 ]
Yang, Xinan [4 ]
Ma, Mingjie [4 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou City Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou City Univ, Key Lab Safe Construct & Intelligent Maintenance U, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[3] China MCC17 Grp Co Ltd, Maanshan 234000, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
关键词
analogous material; composite lining; contact pressure; deformation; model test; mountain tunnel; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; MECHANICAL RESPONSE; FACE STABILITY; SLOPE;
D O I
10.12989/gae.2024.36.1.051
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Currently, composite lining mountain tunnels in China are generally classified based on the [BQ] method for the surrounding rock grade. Increasingly, tunnel field construction is replicated indoors for scale down model tests. However, the development of analogous materials for model tests of composite lining tunnels with different surrounding rock grades is still unclear. In this study, typical Class III and V surrounding rock analogous materials and corresponding composite lining support materials were developed. The whole processes of excavation-support dynamics of the mountain tunnels were simulated. Data on the variation of deformations, contact pressures and strains on the surrounding rock were obtained. Finally, a comparative analysis between model tests and numerical simulations was performed to verify the rationality of analogous material development. The following useful conclusions were obtained by analyzing the data from the tests. The main analogous materials of Class III surrounding rock are barite powder, high-strength gypsum and quartz sand with fly ash, quartz sand, anhydrous ethanol and rosin for Class V surrounding rock. Analogous materials for rockbolts, steel arches are replaced by aluminum bar and iron bar respectively with both shotcrete and secondary lining corresponding to gypsum and water. In addition, load release rate of Class V surrounding rock should be less than Class III surrounding rock. The fenestration level had large influence on the load sharing ratio of the secondary lining, with a difference of more than 30%, while the influence of the support time was smaller. The Sharing ratios of secondary lining in Class III surrounding rock do not exceed 12%, while those of Class V surrounding rock exceed 40%. The overall difference between the results of model tests and numerical simulations is small, which verifies the feasibility of similar material development in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 69
页数:19
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Model tests on dynamic responses of surrounding rock and support structure on underground tunnel under combined dynamic and static loading
    Wang, Q. R.
    Xie, L. X.
    Song, E. X.
    Kong, F. L.
    Fan, J. Q.
    Yu, L. Y.
    Xu, J. M.
    Shi, X. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2023, 171
  • [2] Model tests for deformation and failure characteristics during layered soft rock tunnel excavation under different horizontal stress conditions
    Shu X.
    Tian H.
    Chen W.
    Guo C.
    Zhu Z.
    Tian Y.
    Li Z.
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42 : 4204 - 4215