Novel echocardiographic markers for left ventricular filling pressure prediction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (ECHO-PREDICT): a prospective cross-sectional study

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a complex clinical syndrome associated with a high level of morbidity and mortality, constituting 56% of heart failure cases and showing an increasing prevalence. The E/Ea ratio, used for echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure, has been commonly recommended as a noninvasive measure. However, its validity lacks robust prospective validation in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction, and its accuracy has been questioned in comparison to patients with reduced LV ejection fraction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of novel echocardiographic markers incorporating peak E velocity, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP) for noninvasive estimation of LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) against invasive measurement. In this cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital, a sample size of 122 participants was utilized. Statistical analyses including independent samples t-test, chi(2) test, and linear regression analysis were employed to explore correlations and predict outcomes. The results indicated that Group 1 (LVEDP <20 mmHg) had a mean age of 59.25 years, while Group 2 (LVEDP >20 mmHg) had a mean age of 56.93 years. Mitral E velocity positively predicted LVEDP, while Mitral E/A ratio showed a negative association. Notably, (E+PAP)/2, (E+LAVi)/2, and Mitral E exhibited good discriminative ability, with respective area under the curve values of 0.840, 0.900, and 0.854. (E+LAVi)/2 demonstrated the highest discriminatory power, with a threshold of 40.100, yielding high sensitivity (0.971) but relatively low specificity (0.302) in predicting LVEDP greater than 20. These findings emphasize the accuracy and utility of combining diastolic variables and peak E velocity as markers for left ventricular filling pressure in patients with a high burden of cardiac disease. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of these parameters in assessing cardiac abnormalities and supports the potential of novel echocardiographic parameters, particularly (E+LAVi)/2, in predicting LVEDP greater than 20. Further research is warranted to validate and explore the prognostic implications of these parameters in larger patient populations, ultimately improving the diagnosis and management of cardiac disease and enhancing clinical outcomes.