The efficiency evaluation and the spatiotemporal differences of CO2 emissions in China's construction industry

被引:4
|
作者
Sun, Ken [1 ]
Han, Jingmin [2 ]
Sun, Weidong [1 ]
Yan, Tianshu [2 ]
Liu, Chang [1 ]
Yang, Zhenzhen [1 ]
He, Wenbo [2 ]
Xie, Weisheng [2 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Environm & Municipal Engn, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
[2] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Coll Water Conservancy, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
关键词
CO 2 emission efficiency; Spatiotemporal differences; Super-efficiency SBM-DEA model; GML index; Construction industry; DEA MODEL; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139205
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the promotion of China's double carbon policy, China's construction industry (CI) is facing the pressure for CO2 emissions (CE) reduction. In order to promote China's high-quality green development, CO2 emissions efficiency (CEE) evaluation in China's CI was crucial. Based on the super-efficiency slacks-based measure-data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model, the Global Malmquist-Luenberger (GML) index, the global and local Moran index in spatial autocorrelation, 11 indicators of CI were selected to evaluate CEE and the spatiotemporal differences of CEE in China's CI 31 provinces from 2000 to 2020 were analyzed. The results indicated the CEE was on the rise on the whole. The average annual CEE of Hainan, Heilongjiang, Tianjin, Shanghai and Xizang was bigger than 1. The CEE of Sichuan, Gansu and Guizhou was around 0.5. The order of CE of CI in China from high to low Was South China, North China, Northeast China, Central China, East China, Northwest China and Southwest China. The GML index increased by 6.25% annually, the average annual TC increased by 11.68%, and the average annual EC increased by 5.21%. The overall CEE of China's CI showed a positive correlation between 2010 and 2015, but the spatial agglomeration was weak.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spillover effect of technological innovation on CO2 emissions in China's construction industry
    Wen, Quan
    Chen, Yang
    Hong, Jingke
    Chen, Yan
    Ni, Danfei
    Shen, Qiping
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 171
  • [2] Refined estimate of China's CO2 emissions in spatiotemporal distributions
    Liu, M.
    Wang, H.
    Wang, H.
    Oda, T.
    Zhao, Y.
    Yang, X.
    Zang, R.
    Zang, B.
    Bi, J.
    Chen, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (21) : 10873 - 10882
  • [3] Provincial Differences on CO2 Emissions in China's Power Industry: A Quantile Regression Approach
    Wen, Lei
    Zhang, Xin
    Zhang, Zhiqun
    Shao, Hengyang
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (05): : 3929 - 3939
  • [4] Regional differences in the CO2 emissions of China's iron and steel industry: Regional heterogeneity
    Xu, Bin
    Lin, Boqiang
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 88 : 422 - 434
  • [5] CO2 emissions from China's lime industry
    Shan, Yuli
    Liu, Zhu
    Guan, Dabo
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 166 : 245 - 252
  • [6] Tracing CO2 emissions of China's construction sector
    Wang, Ju
    Wang, Zhen
    Peng, Sha
    Li, Cai
    Wei, Liyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 275
  • [7] Regional differences on CO2 emission efficiency in metallurgical industry of China
    Lin, Boqiang
    Xu, Mengmeng
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 120 : 302 - 311
  • [8] Industrial CO2 Emissions Efficiency and its Determinants in China: Analyzing Differences Across Regions and Industry Sectors
    Shen, Chen
    Feng, Rui
    Yu, Binbin
    Liao, Zhongju
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2018, 27 (03): : 1239 - 1253
  • [9] Measuring CO2 emissions performance of China's construction industry: A global Malmquist index analysis
    Cheng, Min
    Lu, Yujie
    Zhu, Hang
    Xiao, Jianzhuang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 92
  • [10] Why are there large regional differences in CO2 emissions? Evidence from China's manufacturing industry
    Xu, Renjing
    Lin, Boqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 1330 - 1343