Building 1D and 3D static reservoir geomechanical properties models in the oil field

被引:6
|
作者
Sanei, Manouchehr [1 ]
Ramezanzadeh, Ahmad [2 ]
Asgari, Amin [2 ]
机构
[1] Yazd Univ, Yazd, Iran
[2] Shahrood Univ Technol, Shahroud, Iran
关键词
Reservoir geomechanical modeling; Well logging data; Geostatistical methods; Volve oil field; PREDICTION; VELOCITY; LOGS;
D O I
10.1007/s13202-022-01553-7
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Reservoir geomechanical models provide valuable information for various applications ranging from the prediction of surface subsidence to the determination of pore pressure and induced stress changes, wellbore stability, fault reactivation, and caprock integrity. Three-dimensional geological modeling of reservoir geomechanics is an essential tool to predict reservoir performance by considering the geomechanics effects. Thus, this study focuses on the application of 3D static reservoir geomechanical model workflow by using 3-D seismic and well log data for proper optimization in the Volve oil field, Norway. 3D Seismic data are applied to generate the interpreted horizon grids and fault polygons. The horizon which cut across the nine wells is used for the detailed topographic analysis. The workflow includes 1D geomechanical and petrophysical models which are calculated at well locations by using log data. Structural and property modeling (pore pressure, vertical and horizontal stresses, elastic properties, porosity, permeability, and hydrocarbon saturation) is distributed by geostatistical methods such as Kriging and Gaussian. This study indicates the effectiveness of the three-dimensional static modeling technique as a tool for better understanding of the spatial distribution of reservoir geomechanical properties, hence, providing a framework for analyzing future activities in the reservoir such as proposal position and trajectory of new wells for future field development and assessing arbitrary injection-production schedules.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 351
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Building 1D and 3D static reservoir geomechanical properties models in the oil field
    Manouchehr Sanei
    Ahmad Ramezanzadeh
    Amin Asgari
    [J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2023, 13 : 329 - 351
  • [2] Reservoir Geomechanical Properties Characterization of 3D Printed Sandstone
    Gomez, J. S.
    Ardila, N.
    Chalaturnyk, R. J.
    Zambrano-Narvaez, G.
    [J]. POROMECHANICS VI: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH BIOT CONFERENCE ON POROMECHANICS, 2017, : 952 - 960
  • [3] 3D geological geomechanical reservoir modeling for the purposes of oil and gas field development optimization
    Shustov, D., V
    Kashnikov, Yu A.
    Ashikhmin, S. G.
    Kukhtinskiy, A. E.
    [J]. GEOMECHANICS AND GEODYNAMICS OF ROCK MASSES (EUROCK2018), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2018, : 1425 - 1430
  • [4] Comparison of 1D and 3D reservoir heat transport models and temperature effects on mass transport
    Polli, Bruna Arcie
    Bleninger, Tobias
    [J]. RBRH-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE RECURSOS HIDRICOS, 2019, 24
  • [5] Improving 1D Stellar Models with 3D Atmospheres
    Mosumgaard, Jakob Rorsted
    Aguirre, Victor Silva
    Weiss, Achim
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jorgen
    Trampedach, Regner
    [J]. SEISMOLOGY OF THE SUN AND THE DISTANT STARS 2016-USING TODAY'S SUCCESSES TO PREPARE THE FUTURE, 2017, 160
  • [6] Stress prediction using 1D and 3D geomechanical models of a tight gas reservoir-A case study from the Lower Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia
    Guerra, C.
    Fischer, K.
    Henk, A.
    [J]. GEOMECHANICS FOR ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 19
  • [7] A matrix projection method for on line stable estimation of 1D and 3D shear building models
    Angel Garcia-Illescas, Miguel
    Alvarez-Icaza, Luis
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 81 : 318 - 338
  • [8] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    De Vincenzo, Salvatore
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2020, 135 (10):
  • [9] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    Salvatore De Vincenzo
    [J]. The European Physical Journal Plus, 135
  • [10] COMPARISON OF 3D IMAGING AND 1D DEPOSITION MODELS: AT WHICH DIMENSION?
    Katz, I.
    Pichelin, M.
    Majoral, C.
    Caillibotte, G.
    Montesantos, S.
    Bennett, M.
    Conway, J.
    Fleming, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (05) : A6 - A6