A comparative assessment of gravitational field modeling methods for binary asteroid landing

被引:1
|
作者
Wen, Tongge [1 ]
Zeng, Xiangyuan [1 ]
Li, Ziwen [1 ]
Yu, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Automat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Aeronaut Sci & Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
landing dynamics; contact dynamics; gravitational field modeling; binary asteroid; PROJECT KINETIC IMPACT; EJECTA CLOUD; SMALL BODY; LANDER; DEPLOYMENT; POLYHEDRON; SECONDARY; DYNAMICS; CONTACT; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s42064-024-0202-z
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency in gravitational field modeling for binary asteroid landing is one of the challenges in dynamical analyses. Four representative gravitational modeling methods are employed and compared in this study. These are the sphere-sphere model, ellipsoid-sphere model, inertia integral-polyhedron method, and finite element method. This study considers the differences between these four models, particularly their effects on the landing dynamics of a lander. A framework to simulate the coupled orbit-attitude motion of a lander in a binary system is first established. Numerical simulations are then performed on the natural landings on the second primary of the (66391) Moshup-Squannit system. The results show significant differences in the final landing dispersions, settling time, and sliding distance when applying the simplified models. On the basis of the modeling accuracy and computational efficiency, the finite element method should be chosen for future missions.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 435
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability-Based Soft Landing Trajectory Optimization near Asteroid with Uncertain Gravitational Field
    Ren, Yuan
    Shan, Jinjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2015, 38 (09) : 1810 - 1820
  • [2] Modeling the Gravitational Potential of a Nonspherical Asteroid
    Herrera-Sucarrat, E.
    Palmer, P. L.
    Roberts, R. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2013, 36 (03) : 790 - 798
  • [3] Asteroid Modeling for Testing Spacecraft Approach and Landing
    Martin, Iain
    Parkes, Steve
    Dunstan, Martin
    Rowell, Nick
    [J]. IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, 34 (04) : 52 - 62
  • [4] Trajectory Optimization for Asteroid Landing Considering Gravitational Orbit-Attitude Coupling
    Chen, Gang
    Cai, Peilin
    Wang, Yifan
    Zhang, Long
    Liang, Ji
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 126464 - 126478
  • [5] CONSOLIDATED PHASE A DESIGN OF ASTEROID IMPACT MISSION: MASCOT-2 LANDING ON BINARY ASTEROID DIDYMOS
    Ferrari, Fabio
    Lavagna, Michele
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2016, PTS I-IV, 2016, 158 : 3759 - 3769
  • [6] A framework of gravity field online modeling and trajectory optimization in asteroid soft-landing mission scenarios
    Feng, Wenyu
    Huo, Mingying
    Xu, Ye
    Mo, Lidong
    Ke, Weiqin
    Ma, Yisen
    Su, Huanli
    Qi, Naiming
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 143
  • [7] Modeling the gravitational field of the ore-bearing asteroid by using the CFD-based method
    Duan, Yabo
    Yin, Zhi
    Zhang, Kefei
    Zhang, Shubi
    Wu, Suqin
    Li, Huaizhan
    Zheng, Nanshan
    Bian, Chaofa
    [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2024, 215 : 664 - 673
  • [8] Modeling the gravitational field of the ore-bearing asteroid by using the CFD-based method
    Duan, Yabo
    Yin, Zhi
    Zhang, Kefei
    Zhang, Shubi
    Wu, Suqin
    Li, Huaizhan
    Zheng, Nanshan
    Bian, Chaofa
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2024, 215 : 664 - 673
  • [9] Multipole Representation of the Gravitational Field of the Asteroid (16) Psyche
    V. I. Nikonov
    [J]. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2023, 63 : 2572 - 2579
  • [10] Multipole Representation of the Gravitational Field of the Asteroid (16) Psyche
    Nikonov, V. I.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 63 (12) : 2572 - 2579