Platform financing or bank financing in agricultural supply chains: The impact of platform digital empowerment

被引:3
|
作者
Lu, Qihui [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Liao, Changhua [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Chen, Meilan [3 ]
Shi, Victor [4 ]
Hu, Xiangling [5 ]
Hu, Weiwei [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ, Modern Business Res Ctr, Minist Educ China, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Business Adm, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Int Business Sch, Guangzhou 528100, Peoples R China
[4] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Lazaridis Sch Business & Econ, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
[5] Grand Valley State Univ, Seidman Coll Business, 50 Front Ave SW, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USA
[6] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Enterprise Digital Intelligence & Business Anal R, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain management; Platform digital empowerment; Platform financing; Yield uncertainty; Supply chain collaboration; EQUILIBRIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.024
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Agricultural supply chains face multiple challenges, including fund shortages and the need for planting technology improvement. With the development of the platform economy, powerful platforms can address these challenges by providing farmers with digital technology empowerment and loan services. This study considers a two -echelon supply chain consisting of a platform and a farmer with yield uncertainty. We establish game -theoretic models with and without platform digital empowerment under bank financing and platform financing. Our main findings are as follow. First, the farmer benefits from empowerment when it reduces or slightly increases the farmer's cost coefficient of planting technology application. Interestingly, there is a possibility that when the cost coefficient of empowerment is too low, the farmer is less likely to benefit from empowerment The platform will always benefit after the farmer accepts the empowerment. Second, if the bankruptcy risk and platform loan interest rate are low (high), both will choose platform (bank) financing. The platform is more willing to provide loan services to the farmer when the platform loan interest rate is low. Furthermore, platform financing can improve the platform digital empowerment level. The empowerment level increases with the bank loan interest rate, whereas it first decreases then increases with the platform loan interest rate. Third, under bank financing, cost -sharing contracts where one firm shares the other's costs can achieve Pareto improvement. However, under platform financing, only when the platform shares the farmer's cost can the supply chain achieve Pareto improvement.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:952 / 964
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agricultural supply chain financing strategy with social responsibility consideration under platform financing mode
    Wang, Yun
    Chen, Yuqing
    Huang, Song
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 62
  • [2] Research on the financing income of supply chains based on an E-commerce platform
    Yu, Hongxin
    Zhao, Yuanjun
    Liu, Zheng
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Shuai
    Wang, Fatao
    Shi, Lihua
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 169
  • [3] Platform financing vs. bank financing: Strategic choice of financing mode under seller competition
    Mandal, Prasenjit
    Basu, Preetam
    Choi, Tsan-Ming
    Rath, Sambit Brata
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 315 (01) : 130 - 146
  • [4] Mixed financing scheme in a capital-constrained supply chain: bank credit and e-commerce platform financing
    Yang, Honglin
    Zhen, Zhiyuan
    Yan, Qiang
    Wan, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (04) : 2423 - 2447
  • [5] Platform financing versus bank financing: "When to choose which" for green production systems
    Xu, Xiaoping
    Chen, Xinyang
    Choi, Tsan-Ming
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 317 (02) : 515 - 532
  • [6] Manufacturer's financing strategy in a dual-channel supply chain: Third -party platform, bank, and retailer credit financing
    Zhen, Xueping
    Shi, Dan
    Li, Yongjian
    Zhang, Chu
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2020, 133
  • [7] FinTech for Supply Chain Operations: Platform Credit Financing
    Sambit Brata, Rath
    Basu, Preetam
    Choi, Tsan-Ming
    Mandal, Prasenjit
    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2024, 71 : 14789 - 14806
  • [8] Online sellers’ financing strategies in an e-commerce supply chain: bank credit vs. e-commerce platform financing
    Shilin Cai
    Qiang Yan
    Electronic Commerce Research, 2023, 23 : 2541 - 2572
  • [9] Online sellers' financing strategies in an e-commerce supply chain: bank credit vs. e-commerce platform financing
    Cai, Shilin
    Yan, Qiang
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (04) : 2541 - 2572
  • [10] The Impact of Platform Encroachment on the Manufacturer's Financing Strategy
    Bi, Gongbing
    Pan, Hao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)