Implementation of digital health interventions in rehabilitation: A scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Pearce, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Costa, Nathalia [3 ]
Sherrington, Catherine [1 ,4 ]
Hassett, Leanne [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Au Nsw 2050, Australia
[2] Royal Rehab Rehabil Ctr, Royal Rehab LifeWorks Ryde, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Rehabilitation; implementation science; technology; telerehabilitation; virtual reality; physical therapists; occupational therapists; allied health personnel; TELEREHABILITATION; THERAPY; CARE; KNOWLEDGE; COVID-19; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/02692155231172299
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective Digital health interventions have potential to enhance rehabilitation services by increasing accessibility, affordability and scalability. However, implementation of digital interventions in rehabilitation is poorly understood. This scoping review aims to map current strategies, research designs, frameworks, outcomes and determinants used to support and evaluate the implementation of digital interventions in rehabilitation. Data sources Comprehensive searches from inception until October 2022 of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDro, SpeechBITE, NeuroBITE, REHABDATA, WHO International Clinical Trial Registry and the Cochrane Library. Methods Two reviewers screened studies against the eligibility criteria. Implementation science taxonomies and methods, including Powell et al.'s compilation of implementation strategies, were used to guide analysis and synthesis of findings. Results The search retrieved 13,833 papers and 23 studies were included. Only 4 studies were randomised controlled trials and 9 studies (39%) were feasibility studies. Thirty-seven discrete implementation strategies were reported across studies. Strategies related to training and educating clinicians (91%), providing interactive assistance (61%), and developing stakeholder interrelationships (43%) were most frequently reported. Few studies adequately described implementation strategies and methods for selecting strategies. Almost all studies measured implementation outcomes and determinants; most commonly, acceptability, compatibility and dose delivered of digital interventions. Conclusion The rigour of implementation methods in the field is currently poor. Digital interventions require carefully planned and tailored implementation to facilitate successful adoption into rehabilitation practice. To keep pace with rapidly advancing technology, future rehabilitation research should prioritise using implementation science methods to explore and evaluate implementation while testing effectiveness of digital interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / 1551
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the carbon footprint of digital health interventions: a scoping review
    Lokmic-Tomkins, Zerina
    Davies, Shauna
    Block, Lorraine J.
    Cochrane, Lindy
    Dorin, Alan
    von Gerich, Hanna
    Lozada-Perezmitre, Erika
    Reid, Lisa
    Peltonen, Laura-Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (12) : 2128 - 2139
  • [2] Barriers, Facilitators and Interventions to Support Virtual Reality Implementation in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
    Glegg, Stephanie Miranda Nadine
    Levac, Danielle Elaine
    [J]. PM&R, 2018, 10 (11) : 1237 - +
  • [3] Implementation of digital health technologies for older adults: a scoping review
    Jutai, Jeffrey W.
    Hatoum, Farah
    Bhardwaj, Devvrat
    Hosseini, Marjan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN AGING, 2024, 5
  • [4] A scoping review of implementation of health-focused interventions in vulnerable populations
    Daniels, Sarah, I
    Cheng, Hannah
    Gray, Caroline
    Kim, Bo
    Stave, Christopher Donald
    Midboe, Amanda M.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (09) : 935 - 944
  • [5] Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review
    Wongvibulsin, Shannon
    Habeos, Evagelia E.
    Huynh, Pauline P.
    Xun, Helen
    Shan, Rongzi
    Rodriguez, Kori A. Porosnicu
    Wang, Jane
    Gandapur, Yousuf K.
    Osuji, Ngozi
    Shah, Lochan M.
    Spaulding, Erin M.
    Hung, George
    Knowles, Kellen
    Yang, William E.
    Marvel, Francoise A.
    Levin, Eleanor
    Maron, David J.
    Gordon, Neil F.
    Martin, Seth S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (02)
  • [6] A scoping review of therapist behaviors in guided digital mental health interventions
    Gonzalez-Robles, Alberto
    Miguel, Clara
    Richards, Derek
    Duffy, Daniel
    Enrique, Angel
    [J]. INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH, 2024, 37
  • [7] Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence: Scoping Review
    Lee, Sol
    Rajaguru, Vasuki
    Baek, Joon Sang
    Shin, Jaeyong
    Park, Youngmok
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [8] Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression: Scoping Review of User Engagement
    Lipschitz, Jessica M.
    Van Boxtel, Rachel
    Torous, John
    Firth, Joseph
    Lebovitz, Julia G.
    Burdick, Katherine E.
    Hogan, Timothy P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (10)
  • [9] Evaluation of the Use of Digital Mental Health Platforms and Interventions: Scoping Review
    Balcombe, Luke
    De Leo, Diego
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [10] Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review
    Willis, Van C.
    Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas
    Jabbarpour, Yalda
    Scheufele, Elisabeth L.
    Arriaga, Yull E.
    Ajinkya, Monica
    Rhee, Kyu B.
    Bazemore, Andrew
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (01)