AI maturity in health care: An overview of 10 OECD countries

被引:0
|
作者
Castonguay, Alexandre [1 ]
Wagner, Gerit [2 ]
Motulsky, Aude [3 ]
Pare, Guy [4 ]
机构
[1] Fac Sci Infirmieres, Pavillon Marguer Youville,CP 6128 Succ Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Bamberg, Fac Informat Syst & Appl Comp Sci, Kapuzinerstr 16, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany
[3] Univ Montreal, Ecole Sante Publ, CP 6128 succursale Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] HEC Montreal, Dept Technol Informat, 3000 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Health care; Policy; Comparative study;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104938
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its applications in health care are on the agenda of policymakers around the world, but a major challenge remains, namely, to set policies that will ensure wide acceptance and capture the value of AI while mitigating associated risks. Objective: This study aims to provide an overview of how OECD countries strategize about how to integrate AI into health care and to determine their actual level of AI maturity. Methods: A scan of government-based AI strategies and initiatives adopted in 10 proactive OECD countries was conducted. Available documentation was analyzed, using the Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development's roadmap to AI maturity as a conceptual framework. Results: The findings reveal that most selected OECD countries are at the Emerging stage (Level 2) of AI in health maturity. Despite considerable funding and a variety of approaches to the development of an AI in health supporting ecosystem, only the United Kingdom and United States have reached the highest level of maturity, an integrated and collaborative AI in health ecosystem (Level 3). Conclusion: Despite policymakers looking for opportunities to expedite efforts related to AI, there is no one-size -fits-all approach to ensure the sustainable development and safe use of AI in health. The principles of equifinality and mindfulness must thus guide policymaking in the development of AI in health care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN OVERVIEW OF SELECTED RISK FACTORS FOR HEALTH IN OECD COUNTRIES
    Sopko, Jakub
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH ECONOMICS & FINANCE VIRTUAL CONFERENCE, 2020, : 235 - 248
  • [2] FINANCE OF PRIMARY-EDUCATION IN 10 OECD COUNTRIES - COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW
    SHERMAN, JD
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, 1979, 23 (02) : 293 - 301
  • [3] Comparison of Health Care Systems in European Countries of OECD
    Kujawska, Justyna
    [J]. PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2015, 13 (02): : 112 - 128
  • [4] Health care system performance of 27 OECD countries
    Tchouaket, Eric N.
    Lamarche, Paul A.
    Goulet, Lise
    Contandriopoulos, Andre Pierre
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 27 (02): : 104 - 129
  • [5] THE REFORM OF HEALTH-CARE SYSTEMS - A REVIEW OF 17 OECD COUNTRIES - OECD
    SECHREST, S
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1995, 120 (09) : 36 - 42
  • [6] Health care financing and productivity of health care in OECD countries: a stochastic frontier analysis
    Constantin Ogloblin
    [J]. Eurasian Economic Review, 2023, 13 : 259 - 283
  • [7] Health care financing and productivity of health care in OECD countries: a stochastic frontier analysis
    Ogloblin, Constantin
    [J]. EURASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 13 (02) : 259 - 283
  • [8] Environmental taxes in OECD countries: An overview
    Barde, JP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHINA AND OECD COUNTRIES, 1999, : 19 - 50
  • [9] Health care quality in 15 OECD countries: policies and institutions
    Berchet, C.
    Forde, I.
    Klazinga, N. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27
  • [10] The redistributive effect of health care finance in twelve OECD countries
    van Doorslaer, E
    Wagstaff, A
    van der Burg, H
    Christiansen, T
    Citoni, G
    Di Biase, R
    Gerdtham, UG
    Gerfin, M
    Gross, L
    Häkinnen, U
    John, J
    Johnson, P
    Klavus, J
    Lachaud, C
    Lauritsen, J
    Leu, R
    Nolan, B
    Pereira, J
    Propper, C
    Puffer, F
    Rochaix, L
    Schellhorn, M
    Sundberg, G
    Winkelhake, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1999, 18 (03) : 291 - 313