Understanding human participant research ethics: The perspectives of social scientists in Central Asia

被引:2
|
作者
Sagitova, Roza [1 ]
Ramazanova, Markhabat [1 ]
Sharplin, Elaine [1 ]
Berekeyeva, Aipara [1 ]
Parmenter, Lynne [1 ]
机构
[1] Nazarbayev Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Astana, Kazakhstan
关键词
Ethics; Central Asia; Human participant research ethics; Research ethics committees; social sciences;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102303
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Central Asian (CA) countries have been actively developing their research and knowledge production systems. However, inconsistent alignment with international research ethics norms creates challenges for researchers in CA to equally participate in global knowledge production. Based on quantitative survey responses of 296 social science researchers from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan, this paper explores social scientists' understandings of international principles and practices of human participant research ethics. The findings show that CA social science researchers focus on a broad understanding of research integrity, focused on academic and professional integrity. The respondents highlighted the importance of individual researcher values such as honesty, responsibility, and respectfulness. With only 35 % of the respondents reporting the existence of a research ethics committee (REC) at their institutions, most respondents believe that human participant research ethics are an individual rather than an institutional responsibility in Central Asia. This study has implications for developing research and policy in other post-Soviet and emerging research contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ethics is for human subjects too: Participant perspectives on responsibility in health research
    Cox, Susan M.
    McDonald, Michael
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 98 : 224 - 231
  • [2] Research ethics for social scientists
    Adkisson, Richard V.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2007, 44 (03): : 572 - 573
  • [3] "Ethics Is for Human Subjects Too": Understanding Participant Responsibility in Health Research
    Cox, Susan
    McDonald, Michael
    Hancock, Sara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2010, 9 (04): : 342 - 343
  • [4] Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives
    Michelle Wallace
    Neroli Sheldon
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 128 : 267 - 277
  • [5] Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives
    Wallace, Michelle
    Sheldon, Neroli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 128 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [6] Research ethics and integrity for social scientists
    Watson, Debby
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2015, 38 (03) : 335 - 336
  • [7] Ethical human participant research in Central Asia: a quantitative analysis of attitudes and practices among social science researchers based in the region
    Berekeyeva, Aipara
    Sharplin, Elaine
    Courtney, Matthew
    Sagitova, Roza
    [J]. RESEARCH ETHICS, 2024, 20 (02) : 304 - 330
  • [8] PERSPECTIVES ON HUMAN MICROBIOME RESEARCH ETHICS
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Achenbaum, Laura S.
    Whitney, Simon N.
    Slashinski, Melody J.
    Versalovic, James
    Keitel, Wendy A.
    McCurdy, Sheryl A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2012, 7 (03) : 1 - 14
  • [9] A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists
    Moon, Katie
    Blackman, Deborah
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (05) : 1167 - 1177