Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review

被引:10
|
作者
Tanveer, Mohammed Anass [1 ,5 ]
Mildestvedt, Thomas [2 ]
Skjaerseth, Idun Grimstad [1 ]
Arntzen, Harlad Haugsmyr [1 ]
Kenne, Ellinor [3 ]
Bonnevier, Anna [4 ]
Stenfors, Terese [4 ]
Kvernenes, Monika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Ctr Med Educ, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Div Learning, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Univ Bergen, Fac Med, N-5009 Bergen, Norway
关键词
peer -assisted learning; medical school; medical student; peer teacher; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; TUTORS; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2147/AMEP.S401766
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention is given to the learning outputs for the student-teachers. This systematic review focuses on the learning outputs for medical undergraduates acting as student-teachers in the last decade (2012-2022). Aim: Our aim is to describe what learning outputs student-teachers have from peer teaching, and map what research methods are used to assess the outputs. We defined learning outputs in a broad sense, including all types of learning experiences, intended and nonintended, associated with being a peer teacher. Methods: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Title, abstract and full text were screened by 8 independent reviewers and selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria. We excluded papers not describing structured peer teaching interventions with student-teachers in a formalized role. From the included articles we extracted information about the learning outputs of being a student-teacher as medical undergraduate. Results: From 668 potential titles, 100 were obtained as full-texts, and 45 selected after close examination, group deliberation, updated search and quality assessment using MERSQI score (average score 10/18). Most articles reported learning outputs using mixed methods (67%). Student-teachers reported an increase in subject-specific learning (62%), pedagogical knowledge and skills (49%), personal outputs (31%) and generic skills (38%). Most articles reported outputs using self-reported data (91%). Conclusion: Although there are few studies that systematically investigate student-teachers learning outputs, evidence suggests that peer teaching offers learning outputs for the student-teachers and helps them become better physicians. Further research is needed to enhance learning outputs for student-teachers and systematically investigate student-teachers' learning outputs and its impact on student-teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 739
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条