Evaluating Machine Learning-Based Approaches in Land Subsidence Susceptibility Mapping

被引:1
|
作者
Hosseinzadeh, Elham [1 ]
Anamaghi, Sara [2 ]
Behboudian, Massoud [3 ]
Kalantari, Zahra [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Dept Civil Engn, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Tehran 1996715433, Iran
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, S-11428 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
land subsidence modeling; classification; machine learning algorithms; Semnan plain; Kashmar Plain; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; COVER CLASSIFICATION; RANDOM-FOREST; REGRESSION; VALIDATION; PREDICTION; MODELS; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/land13030322
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land subsidence (LS) due to natural and human-driven forces (e.g., earthquakes and overexploitation of groundwater) has detrimental and irreversible impacts on the environmental, economic, and social aspects of human life. Thus, LS hazard mapping, monitoring, and prediction are important for scientists and decision-makers. This study evaluated the performance of seven machine learning approaches (MLAs), comprising six classification approaches and one regression approach, namely (1) classification and regression trees (CARTs), (2) boosted regression tree (BRT), (3) Bayesian linear regression (BLR), (4) support vector machine (SVM), (5) random forest (RF), (6) logistic regression (LogR), and (7) multiple linear regression (MLR), in generating LS susceptibility maps and predicting LS in two case studies (Semnan Plain and Kashmar Plain in Iran) with varying intrinsic characteristics and available data points. Multiple input variables (slope, aspect, groundwater drawdown, distance from the river, distance from the fault, lithology, land use, topographic wetness index (TWI), and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)), were used as predictors. BRT outperformed the other classification approaches in both case studies, with accuracy rates of 75% and 74% for Semnan and Kashmar plains, respectively. The MLR approach yielded a Mean Square Error (MSE) of 0.25 for Semnan plain and 0.32 for Kashmar plain. According to the BRT approach, the variables playing the most significant role in LS in Semnan Plain were groundwater drawdown (20.31%), distance from the river (17.11%), land use (14.98%), NDVI (12.75%), and lithology (11.93%). Moreover, the three most important factors in LS in Kashmar Plain were groundwater drawdown (35.31%), distance from the river (23.1%), and land use (12.98%). The results suggest that the BRT method is not significantly affected by data set size, but increasing the number of training set data points in MLR results in a decreased error rate.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land subsidence susceptibility mapping based on InSAR and a hybrid machine learning approach
    Alesheikh, Ali Asghar
    Chatrsimab, Zahra
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    Lee, Saro
    Jafari, Ali
    Panahi, Mahdi
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2024, 27 (02): : 255 - 267
  • [2] LAND SUBSIDENCE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Eghrari, Z.
    Delavar, M. R.
    Zare, M.
    Beitollahi, A.
    Nazari, B.
    [J]. ISPRS GEOSPATIAL CONFERENCE 2022, JOINT 6TH SENSORS AND MODELS IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, SMPR/4TH GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH, GIRESEARCH CONFERENCES, VOL. 10-4, 2023, : 129 - 136
  • [3] Land Subsidence Susceptibility Mapping in South Korea Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Shahabi, Himan
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Chapi, Kamran
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Chen, Wei
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Panahi, Mahdi
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    Saro, Lee
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (08)
  • [4] Machine learning-based techniques for land subsidence simulation in an urban area
    Liu, Jianxin
    Liu, Wenxiang
    Allechy, Fabrice Blanchard
    Zheng, Zhiwen
    Liu, Rong
    Kouadio, Kouao Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 352
  • [5] A machine learning approach for mapping susceptibility to land subsidence caused by ground water extraction
    Orlandi, Diana
    Díaz, Esteban
    Tomás, Roberto
    Galatolo, Federico A.
    Cimino, Mario G.C.A.
    Pagli, Carolina
    Perilli, Nicola
    [J]. Applied Computing and Geosciences, 2024, 24
  • [6] Leveraging GNSS tropospheric products for machine learning-based land subsidence prediction
    Tasan, Melika
    Ghorbaninasab, Zahrasadat
    Haji-Aghajany, Saeid
    Ghiasvand, Alireza
    [J]. EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (04) : 3039 - 3056
  • [7] Leveraging GNSS tropospheric products for machine learning-based land subsidence prediction
    Melika Tasan
    Zahrasadat Ghorbaninasab
    Saeid Haji-Aghajany
    Alireza Ghiasvand
    [J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 3039 - 3056
  • [8] Comparison of statistical and machine learning approaches in land subsidence modelling
    Rafiei Sardooi, Elham
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Azareh, Ali
    Soleimani Sardoo, Farshad
    Clague, John J.
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (21) : 6165 - 6185
  • [9] Performance Evaluation of GIS-Based Novel Ensemble Approaches for Land Subsidence Susceptibility Mapping
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Lee, Saro
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    Chandra Pal, Subodh
    Asadi Nalivan, Omid
    Saha, Asish
    Chowdhuri, Indrajit
    Moayedi, Hossein
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [10] A comprehensive review of machine learning-based methods in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Liu, Songlin
    Wang, Luqi
    Zhang, Wengang
    He, Yuwei
    Pijush, Samui
    [J]. GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 58 (06) : 2283 - 2301