Connections between the Model of the Supreme Public Audit Institution and Some Economic, Social, Political, and Cultural Variables

被引:0
|
作者
Cimpan, Marius [1 ]
Pacuraru-Ionescu, Catalin-Paul [2 ]
Borlea, Sorin Nicolae [3 ,4 ]
Jansen, Adela [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oradea, Sch Finance, Oradea, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Sch Accounting, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Univ Oradea, Sch Econ, Oradea, Romania
[4] Vasile Goldis Western Univ Arad, Fac Econ Comp Sci & Engn, Arad, Romania
[5] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
supreme audit institution; coercive isomorphism; mimetic isomorphism; normative isomorphism; ISOMORPHISM; STANDARDS; ADOPTION; QUALITY; MATTERS; IMPACT; LAW;
D O I
10.2478/picbe-2023-0179
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Practically, all the countries of the world have at least one Supreme Audit Institution (SAI), but the organizational model and its attributions are different. Academic literature has identified three major types of models: Westminster, judicial and council, but there are also hybrid or original models. This study evaluates the differences between them and the correlations of each institutional type with economic development, education, political rights, civil liberties, and national cultural variables. Comparisons are made within the institutional theories regarding three types of isomorphism: coercive, mimetic and normative. These isomorphic trends are only partially evidenced by the empirical analysis carried out.
引用
收藏
页码:2036 / 2052
页数:17
相关论文
共 8 条