Perioperative, function, and positive surgical margin in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal single port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Jiang, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
Qin, Shize [1 ]
Zhong, Shuting [1 ]
Huang, Xiaohua [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Urol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Single port; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal approach; Transabdominal approach; Meta-analysis; ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; OUTCOMES; PATTERNS; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-023-03272-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches are two common modalities in single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), but differences in safety and efficacy between the two remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the perioperative, function, and positive surgical margin of extraperitoneal with transperitoneal approaches SP-RARP.Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, this study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42023409667). We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published up to February 2023. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze and calculate the risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD).Results A total of five studies, including 833 participants, were included in this study. The SP-TPRP group is superior to the SP-EPRP group in intraoperative blood loss (WMD: - 43.92, 95% CI - 69.81, - 18.04; p = 0.001), the incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and above complications (RR: 0.55, 95% CI - 0.31, 0.99; p = 0.04), and postoperative continence recovery (RR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.05, 1.45; p = 0.04). Conversely, the hospitalization stays (WMD: 7.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 15.1; p = 0.03) for the SP-EPRP group was shorter than that of the SP-TPRP group. However, there was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative pain score, total incidence of postoperative complications, and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates between the two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusions This study demonstrates that both extraperitoneal and extraperitoneal SP-RARP approaches are safe and effective. SP-TPRP is superior to SP-EPRP in postoperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and above complications, and postoperative continence recovery, but it is accompanied by longer hospital stays.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative, function, and positive surgical margin in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal single port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu Jiang
    Yang Liu
    Shize Qin
    Shuting Zhong
    Xiaohua Huang
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21
  • [2] Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Purnomo, Stefanus
    Hamid, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy
    Siregar, Moammar Andar Roemare
    Afriansyah, Andika
    Mirza, Hendy
    Seno, Doddy Hami
    Purnomo, Nugroho
    [J]. UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (05) : 285 - 292
  • [3] Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michael Uy
    Raees Cassim
    Jaehoon Kim
    Jen Hoogenes
    Bobby Shayegan
    Edward D. Matsumoto
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 257 - 264
  • [4] Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis
    Uy, Michael
    Cassim, Raees
    Kim, Jaehoon
    Hoogenes, Jen
    Shayegan, Bobby
    Matsumoto, Edward D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [5] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSPERITONEAL VERSUS EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A META-ANALYSIS
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Kim, Jong Chan
    Kim, Kyu Hyun
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Lee, Hye Young
    Chung, Jae Seung
    Cho, Kang Su
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E352 - E353
  • [6] Meta-analysis of Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Cho, Kang Su
    Choi, Young Deuk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (11): : 919 - 925
  • [7] Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Uy, Michael
    Cassim, Raees
    Kim, Jaehoon
    Hoogenes, Jennifer
    Shayegan, Bobby
    Matsumoto, Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (06)
  • [8] Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Huang, Jing
    Zhang, Peiyan
    Zhang, Lifen
    Lin, Wang
    Wang, Chunhua
    Lin, Dahe
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 230 - 230
  • [9] Single port robot-assisted radical and simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Franco, Antonio
    Ditonno, Francesco
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Pellegrino, Antony A.
    Licari, Leslie Claire
    Bologna, Eugenio
    Feng, Carol
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    De Sio, Marco
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Cherullo, Edward E.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Autorino, Riccardo
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024,
  • [10] Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fahmy, Omar
    Fahmy, Usama A.
    Alhakamy, Nabil A.
    Khairul-Asri, Mohd Ghani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (24)