Environmental and socio-economic effects of construction and demolition waste recycling in the European Union

被引:18
|
作者
Caro, D. [1 ]
Lodato, C. [2 ]
Damgaard, A. [2 ]
Cristobal, J. [3 ]
Foster, G. [1 ]
Flachenecker, F. [4 ,5 ]
Tonini, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Calle Inca Garcilaso, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Bygningstorvet 115, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via Fermi, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[4] European Commiss, Directorate Gen Environm, Brussels, Belgium
[5] UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
关键词
Infrastructure waste; Circular economy; Recycling; Environmental assessment; Socio-economic assessment; Secondary materials; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT; AGGREGATE; CONCRETE; CEMENT; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168295
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The recovery rate of construction and demolition waste (CDW) in the European Union (EU) is at 89 % and thus high relative to other waste streams. However, the relatively high figure can be misleading because it typically does not correspond to high-value material recovery but rather "poor" levels of circularity. From a life-cycle perspective, we assess the environmental impacts and costs of 12 CDW material fractions relying on alterna-tive pathways and treatment technologies. The results indicate important trade-offs in the transition towards the circular economy. Indeed, recycling of concrete, bricks, gypsum, and ceramics and tiles represent the best environmental performance but also the most expensive pathway. However, when shifting from landfill to recycling the total societal costs in the EU are reduced mainly due to the lower external costs. Overall, recycling CDW in the EU with advanced technologies would save about 264 kg CO2-eq t(-1) with a cost of 25 EUR t(-1). The maximum potential for recycling under current technology in the EU would lead to an annual total reduction of about 33 Mt. of CO2-eq using 2020 as reference year. The fractions with the highest potential for improving current waste management practices in terms of environmental improvements are concrete and bricks. The economic and non-economic barriers for realising this potential at EU level are discussed in relation to the European Green Deal and the EU's circular economy objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental feasibility of recycling construction and demolition waste
    I. Atta
    E. S. Bakhoum
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21 : 2675 - 2694
  • [2] Environmental feasibility of recycling construction and demolition waste
    Atta, I.
    Bakhoum, E. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (03) : 2675 - 2694
  • [3] Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices
    Tafesse, Shitaw
    Girma, Yidnekachew Esayas
    Dessalegn, Eliyas
    [J]. HELIYON, 2022, 8 (03)
  • [4] SOCIO-ECONOMIC GAP WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Vlad-George, Camburu
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2010, 57 : 79 - 84
  • [5] The socio-economic impact of diabetes in the European Union
    Kangas, T
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1997, 40 (08) : B8 - B9
  • [6] Institutional and Socio-Economic Convergence in the European Union
    Lopez-Tamayo, Jordi
    Ramos, Raul
    Surinach, Jordi
    [J]. CROATIAN ECONOMIC SURVEY, 2014, 16 (02) : 5 - 28
  • [7] Socio-Economic Modelers of Environmental Performance: Empirical Evidence from the European Union
    Dracea, Raluca Mihaela
    Cristea, Simona Mirela
    Noja, Gratiela Georgiana
    Trica, Carmen Lenuta
    Toro, Gyongyi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2024, 18 (01): : 2733 - 2750
  • [8] Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling in Shenzhen
    Li, Jingru
    Xia, Ruirui
    Li, Jun
    Chen, Guozhou
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, 2017, : 1101 - 1110
  • [9] Environmental and economic advantages of adopting reverse logistics for recycling construction and demolition waste: A case study of Brazilian construction and recycling companies
    Oliveira Neto, Geraldo C.
    Correia, Jose M. F.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (02) : 176 - 185
  • [10] An in depth study of the effects of socio-economic conditions on household waste recycling practices
    Emery, AD
    Griffiths, AJ
    Williams, KP
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2003, 21 (03) : 180 - 190