A comparative study on the three calculation methods for reproduction numbers of COVID-19

被引:0
|
作者
Abudunaibi, Buasiyamu [1 ]
Liu, Weikang [1 ]
Guo, Zhinan [2 ]
Zhao, Zeyu [1 ,3 ]
Rui, Jia [1 ,3 ]
Song, Wentao [1 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Chen, Qiuping [3 ]
Frutos, Roger [3 ]
Su, Chenghao [4 ]
Chen, Tianmu [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, State Key Lab Mol Vaccinol & Mol Diagnost, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Montpellier, Cirad, UMR 17, Intertryp, Montpellier, France
[4] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Xiamen Branch, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
COVID-19; reproduction number (R); definition methods; next generation matrix; serial interval (SI); CHINA; TRANSMISSION; EPIDEMIC;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.1079842
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study uses four COVID-19 outbreaks as examples to calculate and compare merits and demerits, as well as applicational scenarios, of three methods for calculating reproduction numbers. MethodThe epidemiological characteristics of the COVID-19 outbreaks are described. Through the definition method, the next-generation matrix-based method, and the epidemic curve and serial interval (SI)-based method, corresponding reproduction numbers were obtained and compared. ResultsReproduction numbers (R-eff), obtained by the definition method of the four regions, are 1.20, 1.14, 1.66, and 1.12. Through the next generation matrix method, in region H R-eff = 4.30, 0.44; region P R-eff = 6.5, 1.39, 0; region X R-eff = 6.82, 1.39, 0; and region Z R-eff = 2.99, 0.65. Time-varying reproduction numbers (R-t), which are attained by SI of onset dates, are decreasing with time. Region H reached its highest R-t = 2.8 on July 29 and decreased to R-t < 1 after August 4; region P reached its highest R-t = 5.8 on September 9 and dropped to R-t < 1 by September 14; region X had a fluctuation in the R-t and R-t < 1 after September 22; R-t in region Z reached a maximum of 1.8 on September 15 and decreased continuously to R-t < 1 on September 19. ConclusionThe reproduction number obtained by the definition method is optimal in the early stage of epidemics with a small number of cases that have clear transmission chains to predict the trend of epidemics accurately. The effective reproduction number R-eff, calculated by the next generation matrix, could assess the scale of the epidemic and be used to evaluate the effectiveness of prevention and control measures used in epidemics with a large number of cases. Time-varying reproduction number R-t, obtained via epidemic curve and SI, can give a clear picture of the change in transmissibility over time, but the conditions of use are more rigorous, requiring a greater sample size and clear transmission chains to perform the calculation. The rational use of the three methods for reproduction numbers plays a role in the further study of the transmissibility of COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional Estimates of Reproduction Numbers with Application to COVID-19
    Heyder, Stefan
    Burgard, Jan Pablo
    Krueger, Tyll
    Hotz, Thomas
    [J]. PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AT ECMI, 2022, 39 : 163 - 171
  • [2] Estimation of Daily Reproduction Numbers during the COVID-19 Outbreak
    Demongeot, Jacques
    Oshinubi, Kayode
    Rachdi, Mustapha
    Seligmann, Herve
    Thuderoz, Florence
    Waku, Jules
    [J]. COMPUTATION, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [3] Dynamics of the COVID-19 basic reproduction numbers in different countries
    Yue, Tianxiang
    Fan, Bin
    Zhao, Yapeng
    Wilson, John P.
    Du, Zhengping
    Wang, Qing
    Yin, Xiaozhe
    Duan, Xiaonan
    Zhao, Na
    Fan, Zemeng
    Lin, Hui
    Zhou, Chenghu
    [J]. SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2021, 66 (03) : 229 - 232
  • [4] A comparative study of federated learning methods for COVID-19 detection
    Darzi, Erfan
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    van Ooijen, P. M. A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [5] A comparative study of federated learning methods for COVID-19 detection
    Erfan Darzi
    Nanna M. Sijtsema
    P. M. A. van Ooijen
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 14
  • [6] Comparative study of machine learning methods for COVID-19 transmission forecasting
    Dairi, Abdelkader
    Harrou, Fouzi
    Zeroual, Abdelhafid
    Hittawe, Mohamad Mazen
    Sun, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 118
  • [7] Novel Approach for Identification of Basic and Effective Reproduction Numbers Illustrated with COVID-19
    Marinov, Tchavdar T. T.
    Marinova, Rossitza S. S.
    Marinov, Radoslav T. T.
    Shelby, Nicci
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2023, 15 (06):
  • [8] A Comparative Study of Classification Methods on the States of the USA Based on COVID-19 Indicators
    Eliguzel, Ibrahim Mirac
    Ozceylan, Eren
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT PRODUCTION SYSTEMS (APMS 2021), PT III, 2021, 632 : 582 - 590
  • [9] A Comparative Study of COVID-19 Detection Using Deep and Machine Learning Methods
    Sheneamer, Abdullah
    Farahat, Hanan
    Hamdi, Ebtehal
    Qahtani, Mona
    Alkhairat, Bashyir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2022, 22 (03): : 738 - 745
  • [10] Improved time-varying reproduction numbers using the generation interval for COVID-19
    Kim, Tobhin
    Lee, Hyojung
    Kim, Sungchan
    Kim, Changhoon
    Son, Hyunjin
    Lee, Sunmi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11