Does improving economic efficiency reduce ecological footprint? The role of financial development, renewable energy, and industrialization

被引:74
|
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ge, Yunfei [1 ]
Li, Rongrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Urumqi, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental Kuznets curve; ecological footprint; economic efficiency; financial development; renewable energy; industrialization; super-efficiency SBM model; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; DEGRADATION; PANEL; URBANIZATION; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X231183914
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the ongoing expansion of global economic activities, environmental degradation has emerged as a progressively severe challenge. The Sustainable Development Goals are significantly impacted by this issue, making it essential to establish a symbiotic relationship between economic development and environmental protection. In this context, an investigation into the efforts of the OECD to promote ecological protection assumes a critical role, given its prominent position as a leading economic cooperation organization. Therefore, we examine the relationship between economic efficiency, financial development, renewable energy, industrialization, and ecological footprint in 36 OECD countries from 1995 to 2018. An empirical analysis employing the fully modified Ordinary Least Square technique reveals an inverted U-shaped curve relationship between economic efficiency and ecological footprint, supporting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in OECD countries. Moreover, the research reveals that financial development and industrialization exacerbate environmental damage, while the advancement of renewable energy plays a pivotal role in controlling the ecological footprint and fostering environmental conservation. Furthermore, by introducing interaction terms, we find that financial development and renewable energy weaken the positive effect of economic efficiency on the ecological footprint, while industrialization reinforces it. Finally, the findings of the Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality analysis show that the causal relationship between all three variables, namely economic efficiency, financial development and renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint is bidirectional. In contrast, the causal relationship between the degree of industrialization and ecological footprint is unidirectional. These empirical findings provide practical policy recommendations for fostering sustainable development in OECD countries and offers valuable insights and lessons that can inform the formulation of relevant policies in other countries and regions. Overall, this study not only innovatively enriches the theoretical content of the EKC hypothesis from the perspective of the relationship between economic efficiency and ecological footprint, but also has important practical guidance significance.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does renewable energy reduce ecological footprint at the expense of economic growth? An empirical analysis of 120 countries
    Li, Rongrong
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Wang, Qiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 346
  • [2] Economic complexity, renewable energy and ecological footprint: The role of the housing market in the USA
    Joof, Foday
    Samour, Ahmed
    Ali, Mumtaz
    Rehman, Mubeen Abdur
    Tursoy, Turgut
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 311
  • [3] Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Rjoub, Husam
    Kalugina, Olga A.
    Hussain, Nazim
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 30 (04) : 595 - 605
  • [4] Role of green finance in improving energy efficiency and renewable energy development
    Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [5] Role of green finance in improving energy efficiency and renewable energy development
    Ehsan Rasoulinezhad
    Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2022, 15
  • [6] Reinvestigating the EKC hypothesis: Does renewable energy in power generation reduce carbon emissions and ecological footprint?
    Mohamed, Erna Farina
    Abdullah, Azlina
    Jaaffar, Amar Hisham
    Osabohien, Romanus
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2024, 53
  • [7] Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia
    Sharma, Rajesh
    Sinha, Avik
    Kautish, Pradeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 285
  • [8] How Do Institutional Quality, Natural Resources, Renewable Energy, and Financial Development Reduce Ecological Footprint without Hindering Economic Growth Trajectory? Evidence from China
    Makhdum, Muhammad Sohail Amjad
    Usman, Muhammad
    Kousar, Rakhshanda
    Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
    Radulescu, Magdalena
    Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [9] The role of economic growth, financial development, globalization, renewable energy and industrialization in reducing environmental degradation in the economic community of West African States
    Prempeh, Kwadwo Boateng
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [10] Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development
    Destek, Mehmet Akif
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 650 : 2483 - 2489