Mysterious Consumption: Preference for Horizontal (vs. Vertical) Uncertainty and the Role of Surprise

被引:9
|
作者
Buechel, Eva C. [1 ]
Li, Ruoou [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Mkt, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Mkt, Denton, TX 76201 USA
关键词
consumer behavior; judgment and decision making; decisions under uncertainty; surprise; mystery; opaque; surprise marketing; CONSUMER RESPONSE; DECISION-MAKING; PROSPECT-THEORY; CURIOSITY; SPECIFICATIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; PROMOTIONS; BENEFIT; PEOPLE; REGRET;
D O I
10.1093/jcr/ucac039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Mysterious consumption items represent products that are chosen or purchased without knowing the exact nature of the product(s). In contrast to the widely accepted notion of uncertainty aversion, the present research shows that consumers prefer uncertainty over certainty in the context of mysterious consumption. Across a variety of products (stress balls, ice cream, songs, teas, snacks, hotel rooms, masks, rental cars), participants preferred mysterious consumption items over non-mysterious consumption items of equal expected value. The value of mysterious consumption lies at least in part in the uncertainty about the nature of the outcome among objectively similar outcomes. Specifically, the uncertainty around horizontally differentiated outcomes (i.e., outcomes that differ as a matter of taste) in the case of mysterious consumption focuses consumers on the positive side of uncertainty: the opportunity to be surprised. The preference for uncertainty is not observed when the possible outcomes are vertically differentiated (i.e., outcomes that differ in objective superiority, as is the case in existing demonstrations of uncertainty) or when horizontal uncertainty is reduced to a degree that diminishes the ability to be surprised. The findings reconcile literatures on surprise and uncertainty aversion and help explain mysterious consumption as a substantive phenomenon in the marketplace.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 1013
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vertical vs. Horizontal
    Schlussler, Larry
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2010, 302 (03) : 10 - 10
  • [2] Horizontal vs. vertical transmission of fertility preferences
    Di Miceli, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2019, 47 (03) : 562 - 578
  • [3] Horizontal vs. Vertical Interdependence in Multinational Activity
    Badinger, Harald
    Egger, Peter
    [J]. OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2010, 72 (06) : 744 - 768
  • [4] Vertical vs. horizontal presentation formats result in different consumption choices due to construal priming
    Mukherjee, Sudipta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 21 (05) : 1149 - 1164
  • [5] Preference aggregation under uncertainty: Savage vs. Pareto
    Chambers, CP
    Hayashi, T
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2006, 54 (02) : 430 - 440
  • [6] Issues in submaximal grasp: Horizontal vs. vertical grasp
    Cherry, JA
    Bishu, R
    [J]. ADVANCES IN OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOMICS AND SAFETY, 1999, 3 : 133 - 136
  • [7] Inequality persistence through vertical vs. horizontal coalitions
    Pellicer, Miquel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 90 (02) : 258 - 266
  • [8] Selecting Data to Clean for Fact Checking: Minimizing Uncertainty vs. Maximizing Surprise
    Sintos, Stavros
    Agarwal, Pankaj K.
    Yang, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE VLDB ENDOWMENT, 2019, 12 (13): : 2408 - 2421
  • [9] Horizontal vs. vertical partitioning in association rule mining: A comparison
    Das, A
    Bhattacharyya, DK
    Kalita, JK
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2003, : 1617 - 1620
  • [10] Horizontal vs. Vertical Incision on the Anterior Gastric Wall in Pancreaticogastrostomy
    Oida, Takatsugu
    Mimatsu, Kenji
    Kano, Hisao
    Kawasaki, Atsushi
    Kuboi, Youichi
    Fukino, Nobutada
    Kida, Kazutosi
    Amano, Sadao
    [J]. HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (120) : 2627 - 2630