Validation of the Residual Cancer Burden Index as a prognostic tool in women with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Gomes da Cunha, Juliana Pierobon [1 ]
Goncalves, Rodrigo [1 ]
Silva, Fernando [2 ]
Aguiar, Fernando Nalesso [3 ]
Mota, Bruna Salani [1 ]
Chequim, Bruna Bello [1 ]
Soares, Jose Maria [2 ]
Baracat, Edmund C. [2 ]
Filassi, Jose Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Fac Med, Setor Mastol Disciplina Ginecol,Dept Obstet & Gin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Disciplina Ginecol, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Estado Sao Paulo, Setor Patol Mamaria, Inst Canc,Dept Anat Patol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
cancer; breast; chemotherapy; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST;
D O I
10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207771
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aims To correlate the 'Residual Cancer Burden' (RCB) index with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Cancer Institute of the State of Sao Paulo. Methods We analysed the medical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast surgery, from 2011 to December 2017. Variables analysed were age, clinical and pathological staging, molecular subtype, number of recurrences or metastases, number of deaths, value and class of the RCB index. We used the Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank statistics to evaluate the possible association between RCB and OS and DFS. A regression model was used to determine the independent association of the RCB with the outcomes controlling for confounding factors. Results 347 patients were included in the analysis with a mean age of 49.39 years. Initial clinical staging was T3 in 57.9% of patients and 43.8% of patients had N1 axillary status. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant better prognosis for the RCB 0 (pCR) subgroup compared with RCB 1, 2 and 3 (log rank p=0.01). In a multivariate analysis, only the RCB classification showed a statistically significant correlation with DFS (RCB 1, HR 6.9, CI 1.9 to 25.4, p=0.004; RCB 2, HR 4.2, CI 1.6 to 10.8, p=0.03; and RCB 3, HR 7.6, CI 2.76 to 20.8, p=0.00). Conclusion We demonstrated a positive and significant relationship between the RCB index and the risk of relapse and death.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 243
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Residual Cancer Burden Index As AValid Prognostic Tool In Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Semitha, D. N.
    Kumar, D. R.
    Fernandes, D. A.
    BREAST, 2025, 80 : S98 - S99
  • [2] Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: Validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Hamy, Anne-Sophie
    Darrigues, Lauren
    Laas, Enora
    De Croze, Diane
    Topciu, Lucian
    Lam, Giang-Thanh
    Evrevin, Clemence
    Rozette, Sonia
    Laot, Lucie
    Lerebours, Florence
    Pierga, Jean-Yves
    Osdoit, Marie
    Faron, Matthieu
    Feron, Jean-Guillaume
    Lae, Marick
    Reyal, Fabien
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [3] The residual cancer burden index as a valid prognostic indicator in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Xu, Xin
    Zhao, Wei
    Liu, Cuicui
    Gao, Yongsheng
    Chen, Dawei
    Wu, Meng
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Xinzhao
    Song, Xiang
    Yu, Jinming
    Liu, Zhaoyun
    Yu, Zhiyong
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] The residual cancer burden index as a valid prognostic indicator in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Xin Xu
    Wei Zhao
    Cuicui Liu
    Yongsheng Gao
    Dawei Chen
    Meng Wu
    Chao Li
    Xinzhao Wang
    Xiang Song
    Jinming Yu
    Zhaoyun Liu
    Zhiyong Yu
    BMC Cancer, 24
  • [5] Residual proliferative cancer burden (RPCB) is superior to RCB index as prognostic tool in early breast cancer patients (EBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
    Pons, V.
    Perez-Fidalgo, J. A.
    Burgues, O.
    Martin, P.
    Cejalvo, J. M.
    Bermejo, B.
    Lluch, A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [6] Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool
    Nahleh, Z.
    Sivasubramaniam, D.
    Dhaliwal, S.
    Sundarajan, V.
    Komrokji, R.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (06) : 271 - 278
  • [7] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Chinese women with locally advanced breast cancer
    Chow, LWC
    Day, WD
    Ng, KCK
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2001, 67 (05) : 412 - 416
  • [8] Prognostic significance of residual nodal burden using lymph node ratio in locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Agarwal, Reshu
    Philip, Arun
    Pavithran, Keechilat
    Rajanbabu, Anupama
    Goel, Gaurav
    Vijaykumar, D. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 56 (03) : 228 - 235
  • [9] Reproducibility of residual cancer burden for prognostic assessment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Peintinger, Florentia
    Sinn, Bruno
    Hatzis, Christos
    Albarracin, Constance
    Downs-Kelly, Erinn
    Morkowski, Jerzy
    Gould, Rebekah
    Symmans, W. Fraser
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 (07) : 913 - 920
  • [10] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
    Singh, G
    Singh, DP
    Gupta, D
    Muralikrishna, BV
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 61 (01) : 38 - 41