Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians

被引:5
|
作者
Eastwood, Kyle W. [1 ]
May, Ronald [1 ]
Andreou, Pantelis [2 ]
Abidi, Samina [2 ]
Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza [3 ]
Loubani, Osama M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax Infirm, Dept Emergency Med, Emergency Dept,Adm Off, 1796 Summer St,4Th Floor, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Comp Sci, NICHE Res Grp, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Needs-analysis; User-centered design; Emergency medicine; Survey;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) is recognized by emergency physicians (EPs) as an important technology that will affect clinical practice. Several AI-tools have already been developed to aid care delivery in emergency medicine (EM). However, many EM tools appear to have been developed without a cross-disciplinary needs assessment, making it difficult to understand their broader importance to general-practice. Clinician surveys about AI tools have been conducted within other medical specialties to help guide future design. This study aims to understand the needs of Canadian EPs for the apt use of AI-based tools.MethodsA national cross-sectional, two-stage, mixed-method electronic survey of Canadian EPs was conducted from January-May 2022. The survey includes demographic and physician practice-pattern data, clinicians' current use and perceptions of AI, and individual rankings of which EM work-activities most benefit from AI.ResultsThe primary outcome is a ranked list of high-priority AI-tools for EM that physicians want translated into general use within the next 10 years. When ranking specific AI examples, 'automated charting/report generation', 'clinical prediction rules' and 'monitoring vitals with early-warning detection' were the top items. When ranking by physician work-activities, 'AI-tools for documentation', 'AI-tools for computer use' and 'AI-tools for triaging patients' were the top items. For secondary outcomes, EPs indicated AI was 'likely' (43.1%) or 'extremely likely' (43.7%) to be able to complete the task of 'documentation' and indicated either 'a-great-deal' (32.8%) or 'quite-a-bit' (39.7%) of potential for AI in EM. Further, EPs were either 'strongly' (48.5%) or 'somewhat' (39.8%) interested in AI for EM.ConclusionsPhysician input on the design of AI is essential to ensure the uptake of this technology. Translation of AI-tools to facilitate documentation is considered a high-priority, and respondents had high confidence that AI could facilitate this task. This study will guide future directions regarding the use of AI for EM and help direct efforts to address prevailing technology-translation barriers such as access to high-quality application-specific data and developing reporting guidelines for specific AI-applications. With a prioritized list of high-need AI applications, decision-makers can develop focused strategies to address these larger obstacles.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
    Kyle W. Eastwood
    Ronald May
    Pantelis Andreou
    Samina Abidi
    Syed Sibte Raza Abidi
    Osama M. Loubani
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [2] Disaster Training Needs and Expectations Among Turkish Emergency Medicine Physicians - A National Survey
    Gunay, Erkan
    Ersel, Murat
    Yax, Justin A.
    Sheele, Johnathan M.
    Karakurt, Gunnur
    Acar, Kerim
    Frank, Scott H.
    [J]. DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2020, 14 (02) : 229 - 235
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence for Emergency Medicine
    不详
    [J]. NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2020, 23 (08): : 622 - 622
  • [4] Applications of artificial intelligence in emergency medicine
    Grant, Kiran
    McParland, Aidan
    [J]. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 96 (01) : 37 - 39
  • [5] Physical activity prescription by Canadian Emergency Medicine Physicians
    Soegtrop, Robert
    Douglas-Vail, Matt
    Bechamp, Taylor
    Columbus, Melanie
    Wood, Kevin
    Van Aarsen, Kristine
    Sedran, Robert
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2018, 43 (08) : 861 - 864
  • [6] Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A scoping review
    Kirubarajan, Abirami
    Taher, Ahmed
    Khan, Shawn
    Masood, Sameer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2020, 1 (06) : 1691 - 1702
  • [7] The ChatGPT Era: Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine
    Bradshaw, Jace C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 81 (06) : 764 - 765
  • [8] Attitudes towards artificial intelligence in emergency medicine
    Stewart, Jonathon
    Freeman, Samuel
    Eroglu, Ege
    Dumitrascu, Nicole
    Lu, Juan
    Goudie, Adrian
    Sprivulis, Peter
    Akhlaghi, Hamed
    Tran, Viet
    Sanfilippo, Frank
    Celenza, Antonio
    Than, Martin
    Fatovich, Daniel
    Walker, Katie
    Dwivedi, Girish
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2024, 36 (02) : 252 - 265
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Emergency Medicine
    Tang, Kenneth Jian Wei
    Ang, Candice Ke En
    Constantinides, Theodoros
    Rajinikanth, V
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Cheong, Kang Hao
    [J]. BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 41 (01) : 156 - 172
  • [10] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine
    Stewart, Jonathon
    Sprivulis, Peter
    Dwivedi, Girish
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2018, 30 (06) : 870 - 874