3D bioprinting technology to construct bone reconstruction research model and its feasibility evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Lv, Xiao [1 ]
Zhang, Chenyang [1 ]
Liu, Xingzhu [2 ]
Li, Ping [1 ]
Yang, Yadong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Med Coll, Sch Lab Med & Bioengn, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
3D bioprinting; bone reconstruction; cell bio-scaffolds; hydroxyapatite; sodium alginate; gelatin; polycarbonate membrane; IN-VITRO; OSTEOCLAST DIFFERENTIATION; SCAFFOLDS; HYDROXYAPATITE; HYDROGEL; CELLS; BIOMATERIALS; REGENERATION; OSTEOBLAST; PHOSPHATE;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1328078
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore and construct a 3D bone remodeling research model displaying stability, repeatability, and precise simulation of the physiological and biochemical environment in vivo.Methods: In this study, 3D bioprinting was used to construct a bone reconstruction model. Sodium alginate (SA), hydroxyapatite (HA) and gelatin (Gel) were mixed into hydrogel as scaffold material. The osteoblast precursor cells MC3T3-E1 and osteoclast precursor cells RAW264.7 were used as seed cells, which may or may not be separated by polycarbonate membrane. The cytokines osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) were used to induce cell differentiation. The function of scaffolds in the process of bone remodeling was analyzed by detecting the related markers of osteoblasts (alkaline phosphatase, ALP) and osteoclasts (tartrate resistant acid phosphatase, TRAP).Results: The scaffold showed good biocompatibility and low toxicity. The surface morphology aided cell adhesion and growth. The scaffold had optimum degradability, water absorption capacity and porosity, which are in line with the conditions of biological experiments. The effect of induced differentiation of cells was the best when cultured alone. After direct contact between the two types of cells at 2D or 3D level, the induced differentiation of cells was inhibited to varying degrees, although they still showed osteogenesis and osteoclast. After the cells were induced by indirect contact culture, the effect of induced differentiation improved when compared with direct contact culture, although it was still not as good as that of single culture. On the whole, the effect of inducing differentiation at 3D level was the same as that at 2D level, and its relative gene expression and enzyme activity were higher than that in the control group. Hence the scaffold used in this study could induce osteogenesis as well as osteoclast, thereby rendering it more effective in inducing new bone formation.Conclusion: This method can be used to construct the model of 3D bone remodeling mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D Bioprinting Technology and its Potential for Orthopedics
    Zamborsky, R.
    Kokavec, M.
    Danisovic, L.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2016, 22 : S69 - S70
  • [2] Preliminary Application Research of 3D Bioprinting in Craniofacial Reconstruction
    Yan, Yingjie
    Zhang, Ziwei
    Han, Wenqing
    Sun, Mengzhe
    Kim, Byeong Seop
    Zhang, Yan
    Xu, Haisong
    Lei, Dong
    Chai, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (02) : 805 - 808
  • [3] Research Progress of Robot Technology in In situ 3D Bioprinting
    Neng, Xie
    Shi, Guohong
    Shen, Yuling
    Xu, Yuanjing
    Hao, Wang
    Feng, Haiyang
    Dai, Kerong
    Wang, Jinwu
    Cao, Qixin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING, 2022, 8 (04) : 215 - 222
  • [4] Advances in 3D bioprinting technology for functional corneal reconstruction and regeneration
    Jia, Shuo
    Bu, Yashan
    Lau, Dzi-Shing Aaron
    Lin, Zhizhen
    Sun, Tianhao
    Lu, Weijia William
    Lu, Sheng
    Ruan, Changshun
    Chan, Cheuk-Hung Jonathan
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 10
  • [5] Novel 3D bioprinting for urethral reconstruction
    Ekerhult, Olsen A. T.
    Ortac, M.
    Nie, W.
    Mahajan, N.
    Zhao, W.
    Chandra, P.
    Atala, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1988 - S1988
  • [6] Current achievements in 3D bioprinting technology of chitosan and its hybrids
    Mallakpour, Shadpour
    Sirous, Fariba
    Hussain, Chaudhery Mustansar
    NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2021, 45 (24) : 10565 - 10576
  • [7] The 3D Reconstruction Technology for the Bone SCT Image
    Wang, W. J.
    Ge, Zh H.
    Jiang, M.
    Li, Ch L.
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY XIII, VOL 1: ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT, AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATION, 2009, 626-627 : 547 - 552
  • [8] 3D bioprinting microgels to construct implantable vascular tissue
    Wang, Xinhuan
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Wenli
    Liu, Yanyan
    Li, Ailing
    Qiu, Dong
    Zheng, Xiongfei
    Gu, Qi
    CELL PROLIFERATION, 2023, 56 (05)
  • [9] 3D Bioprinting Technology in Biochemical Engineering
    Eom, Tae Yoon
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (03): : 285 - 292
  • [10] 3D Printing and Bioprinting in MEMS Technology
    Chua, Chee Kai
    Yeong, Wai Yee
    An, Jia
    MICROMACHINES, 2017, 8 (07)