Energetic valorization of biogas. A comparison between centralized and decentralized approach

被引:5
|
作者
Gonzalez, Ruben [1 ]
Garcia-Cascallana, Jose [2 ]
Gomez, Xiomar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leon, Sch Ind Comp & Aeronaut Engn, Dept Elect Syst & Automat Engn, Campus Vegazana, Leon 24071, Spain
[2] Univ Leon, Sch Ind Comp & Aeronaut Engn, Dept Chem & Appl Phys, Campus Vegazana, Leon 24071, Spain
关键词
Energy efficiency; Manure co -digestion; Combined heat and power system; Economic feasibility; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; FOAM FORMATION; SWINE MANURE; FOOD WASTE; PLANTS; SCALE; PERSPECTIVES; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2023.119013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the present manuscript, the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of different digestion configurations were evaluated by considering a double turbocharged engine, Jenbacher type JGS 320 GS-BL. Scenarios considered a single farm producing the biogas needed to run the engine (Scenario 1). The second scenario assumed a centralized system treating manure from the surrounding farms (Scenario 2). The third scenario considered partial decentralization with farms treating locally produced wastes, and biogas being transported and valorized in a centralized engine (Scenario 3). Centralized valorization showed the best results. However, this scheme is inappropriate due to the size of the farm needed to support this configuration. The transport of wastes to a centralized treatment unit showed similar efficiency values but the economic feasibility was adversely affected. The worst performance was found for the decentralized configuration with efficiency in the range of 39-43%, much lower values than those obtained from previous cases (58%) with null economic feasibility due to the high costs associated with the transport of biogas either by truck or through a piping system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED ECONOMIES
    MARSCHAK, T
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1969, 59 (02): : 525 - 537
  • [2] The Review and Comparison between Centralized and Decentralized Digital Identity Systems
    Li, Haihua
    Jing, Yue
    Guan, Zhenyu
    Mobile Information Systems, 2024, 2024
  • [3] Biogas system in rural China: Upgrading from decentralized to centralized?
    Chen, Qiu
    Liu, Tianbiao
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 933 - 944
  • [4] Valorization of digestates from urban or centralized biogas plants: a critical review
    F. Guilayn
    M. Rouez
    M. Crest
    D. Patureau
    J. Jimenez
    Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2020, 19 : 419 - 462
  • [5] Valorization of digestates from urban or centralized biogas plants: a critical review
    Guilayn, F.
    Rouez, M.
    Crest, M.
    Patureau, D.
    Jimenez, J.
    REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 19 (02) : 419 - 462
  • [6] First and second law analyses to an energetic valorization process of biogas
    Carolino, Cristina Guedes
    Medeiros Ferreira, Joao Paulo
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 59 : 58 - 64
  • [7] COMPARISON OF DECENTRALIZED AND CENTRALIZED CONTROL IN PABX
    HANSEN, PJ
    NACHRICHTENTECHNISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1978, 31 (06): : 414 - 416
  • [8] Centralized vs. Decentralized: Performance Comparison between BigchainDB and Amazon QLDB
    Lupaiescu, Sergiu
    Cioata, Petru
    Turcu, Cristina Elena
    Gherman, Ovidiu
    Turcu, Corneliu Octavian
    Paslaru, Gabriela
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [9] Comparison Between Communication Infrastructures of Centralized and Decentralized Wide Area Measurement Systems
    Shahraeini, Mohammad
    Javidi, Mohammad Hossein
    Ghazizadeh, Mohammad Sadegh
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2011, 2 (01) : 206 - 211
  • [10] A Comparison of LQR Optimal Performance in the Decentralized and Centralized Settings
    Miller, Daniel E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2016, 61 (08) : 2308 - 2311