Firms' Supply Chain Integration, R&D Collaboration, and Impact on Competitiveness: Evidence from Czechia

被引:1
|
作者
Kveton, Viktor [1 ]
Horak, Petr [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Social Geog & Reg Dev, Albertov 6, Prague 2, Czech Republic
[2] Technol Agcy Czech Republ, Evropska 1692-37, Prague 6, Czech Republic
关键词
R&D Collaboration; Global Production Networks; Competitiveness; Czechia; GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORKS; REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS; PUBLIC RESEARCH; LINKS; COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-023-01242-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to reveal associations between firm strategies for vertical supply chain integration and strategy for horizontal R&D collaboration through the analysis of four Czech regions. Drawing on evolutionary economic geography and global production networks literature, we applied a combinatorial and dynamic view on firms' supply chain integration, R&D collaboration, and impact on competitiveness. Conceptually, we argue that companies not only produce and sell goods at different levels (global, national, regional), but are located in differently developed regions and innovation systems with different institutional qualities. Therefore, various modes of engagement within vertical supply chains and at the same time different R&D collaboration strategies influence competitiveness of firms. Empirically, we revealed that the vertical integration strategy drives levels of regional R&D collaboration for a firm. It turns out that globally more connected and technologically sophisticated firms are not highly interconnected by R&D collaboration within regional/national innovation systems. Moreover, technologically capable firms with little or no R&D collaboration may be highly profitable on average, but they are vulnerable in the long run. Furthermore, an intensive involvement in R&D collaboration had the highest resistance towards economic shocks. We also found statistically significant positive relationship with medium R&D collaboration and productivity of firms.
引用
收藏
页码:5817 / 5840
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of R&D investment on mitigating supply chain disruptions: Empirical evidence from US firms
    Parast, Mahour Mellat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2020, 227
  • [2] Cooperative R&D Game Model of Supply Chain Firms
    Wang Changfeng
    Zhang Peng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF QUANZHOU CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY (MOT2011), 2011, : 133 - 138
  • [3] SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND THE IMPACT ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF FIRMS
    Venus, Klaus
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN MANAGEMENT OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT - 2011, 2011, : 818 - 832
  • [4] The Impact of Antidumping on the R&D of Export Firms: Evidence from China
    Xie, Shenxiang
    Zhang, Mingxin
    Liu, Shenglong
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (09) : 1897 - 1924
  • [5] R&D spillovers in a supply chain and productivity performance in British firms
    Li, Yuxin
    Bosworth, Derek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2020, 45 (01): : 177 - 204
  • [6] R&D spillovers in a supply chain and productivity performance in British firms
    Yuxin Li
    Derek Bosworth
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2020, 45 : 177 - 204
  • [7] Supply chain network structure and firm's R&D investments: empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms
    Huang, Heshu
    Zhang, Jiping
    Yan, Ji
    Gong, Yu
    Wang, Liukai
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 27 (02) : 551 - 571
  • [8] Determinants of R&D collaboration of service firms
    C. Annique Un
    Ana M. Romero-Martínez
    Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez
    [J]. Service Business, 2009, 3 : 373 - 394
  • [9] Determinants of R&D collaboration of service firms
    Un, C. Annique
    Romero-Martinez, Ana M.
    Montoro-Sanchez, Angeles
    [J]. SERVICE BUSINESS, 2009, 3 (04) : 373 - 394
  • [10] The impact of R&D subsidy on innovation: evidence from New Zealand firms
    Le, Trinh
    Jaffe, Adam B.
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 26 (05) : 429 - 452