Up-Front Endoscopy Maximizes Cost-Effectiveness and Cost- Satisfaction in Uninvestigated Dyspepsia

被引:9
|
作者
Wechsler, Emily, V [1 ,2 ]
Ahuja, Nitin K. [3 ]
Brenner, Darren [4 ]
Chan, Walter [5 ]
Chang, Lin [6 ]
Chey, William D. [7 ]
Lembo, Anthony J. [8 ]
Moshiree, Baha [9 ]
Nee, Judy [8 ]
Shah, Shailja C. [10 ]
Staller, Kyle [11 ]
Shah, Eric D. [1 ,2 ,7 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH USA
[2] Dartmouth Hlth, Sect Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Penn Med, Div Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Northwestern Med, Div Gastroenterol, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Gastroenterol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Michigan Med, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
[9] Atrium Hlth, Div Gastroenterol, Charlotte, NC USA
[10] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Gastroenterol, San Diego, CA USA
[11] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
[12] Dartmouth Hitchcock Hlth, Sect Gastroenterol & Hepatol, One Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
关键词
Costs and Cost Analysis; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Insurance; Endoscopy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PRIMARY-CARE; FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA; HEALTH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.003
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Practice guidelines promote a routine noninvasive, non-endoscopic initial approach to investigating dyspepsia without alarm features in young patients, yet many patients undergo prompt upper endoscopy. We aimed to assess tradeoffs among costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to inform discrepancy between guidelines and practice.METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model and performed cost-effectiveness/cost-satisfaction analysis over a 1-year time horizon on patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm features referred to gastroenterology.A RAND/UCLA expert panel informed model design. Four competing diagnostic/management strategies were evaluated: prompt endoscopy, testing for Helicobacter pylori and eradicating if present (test-and-treat), testing for H pylori and performing endoscopy if present (test-and-scope), and empiric acid suppression. Outcomes were derived from systematic reviews of clinical trials. Costs were informed by prospective observational cohort studies and national commercial/federal cost databases. Health gains were represented using quality-adjusted life years.RESULTS: From the patient perspective, costs and outcomes were similar for all strategies (maximum outof-pocket difference of $30 and <0.01 quality-adjusted life years gained/year regardless of strategy). Prompt endoscopy maximized cost-satisfaction and health system reimbursement. Test-and-scope maximized cost-effectiveness from insurer and patient perspectives. Results remained robust on multiple one-way sensitivity analyses on model inputs and across most willingness-to-pay thresholds.CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive management strategies appear to result in inferior cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction outcomes compared with strategies promoting up-front endoscopy. Therefore, additional studies are needed to evaluate the drivers of patient satisfaction to facilitate inclusion in value-based healthcare transformation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:2378 / +
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Satisfaction From Up-Front Endoscopy in the Evaluation of Uninvestigated Dyspepsia: At What Cost?
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Davee, Tomas
    Guha, Sushovan
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (12) : 3195 - 3195
  • [2] Relative Cost-effectiveness of Management Strategies for Uninvestigated Dyspepsia
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Howden, Colin W.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (11) : 2986 - 2987
  • [3] Relative Cost-effectiveness of Management Strategies for Uninvestigated Dyspepsia Reply
    Wechsler, Emily V.
    Chan, Walter
    Shah, Eric D.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (11) : 2987 - 2988
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF DYSPEPSIA MANAGEMENT
    READ, JL
    PASS, TM
    KOMAROFF, AL
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (02): : A501 - A501
  • [5] The cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies in the management of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia (UD): Comparing the CanDys approach to empirical antisecretory therapy and prompt endoscopy
    Barkun, A
    Crott, R
    Fallone, CA
    Kennedy, WA
    Lachaine, J
    Levinton, C
    Armstrong, D
    Chiba, N
    Thomson, ABR
    Van Zanten, VSJO
    Sinclair, P
    Chakraborty, B
    Escobedo, S
    Smyth, S
    White, RE
    Nevin, K
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (03) : 246 - 247
  • [6] A cost-effectiveness analysis of the up-front use of balloon catheter dilation in the treatment of pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis
    House, Laura Kathryn
    Lewis, Andrea F.
    Ashmead, Mary G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 418 - 422
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of and satisfaction with a Helicobacter pylori "test and treat'' strategy compared with prompt endoscopy in young Asians with dyspepsia
    Mahadeva, S.
    Chia, Y-C
    Vinothini, A.
    Mohazmi, M.
    Goh, K-L
    [J]. GUT, 2008, 57 (09) : 1214 - 1220
  • [8] How to truly price an ICD: daily cost or up-front cost?
    Biffi, M.
    Ziacchi, M.
    Bertini, M.
    Gardini, B.
    Mazzotti, A.
    Mantovani, V.
    Cervi, E.
    Diemberger, I.
    Martignani, C.
    Boriani, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 228 - 228
  • [9] Randomized controlled trial of omeprazole or endoscopy in patients with persistent dyspepsia: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Laheij, RJF
    Severens, JL
    Van de Lisdonk, EH
    Verbeek, ALM
    Jansen, JBM
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 12 (12) : 1249 - 1256
  • [10] A Cost-Effectiveness Decision Analytic Model Comparing Transnasal Esophagoscopy to Conventional Endoscopy for Dyspepsia
    Saumoy, Monica
    Schneider, Yecheskel
    Otaki, Fouad
    Kumta, Nikhil
    Sharaiha, Reem
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S152 - S152