Spontaneous vesicoureteral reflux resolution curves based on ureteral diameter ratio

被引:2
|
作者
Arlen, Angela M. [1 ]
Leong, Traci [2 ,3 ]
Kirsch, Andrew J. [4 ]
Cooper, Christopher S. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Urol & Pediat, Iowa City, IA USA
[6] Univ Iowa, Dept Urol, 200 Hawkins Dr, 3RCP, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Vesicoureteral reflux; Resolu-tion; Ureteral diameter ratio; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.04.028
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction Various factors influence the clinical course of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in the pediatric population. Distal ureteral diameter ratio (UDR) is an objective measure reflective of ureterovesical junction anatomy that has been shown to independently predict both spontaneous resolution and breakthrough febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) in children with primary reflux. UDR resolution curves were created, hypothesizing that a UDR value existed at which spontaneous resolution was unlikely to occur. Materials and methods UDR was computed by measuring largest ureteral diameter within the pelvis and dividing by the distance between L1-L3 vertebral bodies. Recursive partitioning with 10-fold cross validation methodology for time to event data, utilizing martingale residuals was used to create high and low risk groups based on UDR, and stratified by age at diagnosis and laterality. Results Three hundred and four patients (226 female, 78 male) were analyzed with a mean age at diagnosis of 1.55 & PLUSMN; 1.98 years. Unilateral reflux (p = 0.02), VUR grades 1-3 (p < 0.001), and lower UDR (p < 0.001) were associated with spontaneous resolution on univariate analysis. UDR values were categorized into risk groups based on recursive partitioning. Low risk patients (those with UDR <0.30) achieved VUR resolution faster and with a continuing rate compared to the high-risk group (>0.30), which had persistent reflux after 3 years [Summary Figure]. When the 0.30 cutoff was applied randomly to patients in test group, the cutoff significantly discriminated between low and high-risk patients (log rank test p = 0.02). Discussion Primary VUR is often a self-limiting diagnosis, with conservative management favored in low-risk children, UDR may be used to help distinguish those children who may benefit from intervention. Unlike traditional VUR grading where children with any grade of reflux may spontaneously resolve, there appears to be a consistent UDR cutoff whereby patients are very unlikely to spontaneously resolve, regardless of length of follow-up. Therefore, parents of children with a UDR above the 0.3 cutoff, regardless of VUR grade, may be counselled that VUR is very unlikely to resolve over time -thereby reducing the number of VCUGs and length of time these patients are on prophylactic antibiotic prior to surgical intervention. Conclusions Children with primary VUR and a UDR of greater than 0.30 are significantly less likely to spontaneously resolve regardless of length of follow-up, and resolution after 3 years was rare. UDR provides objective prognostic information facilitating individualized patient management.
引用
收藏
页码:468.e1 / 468.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SPONTANEOUS VESICOURETERAL REFLUX RESOLUTION CURVES BASED ON URETERAL DIAMETER RATIO
    Arlen, Angela M.
    Leong, Traci
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    Cooper, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E943 - E943
  • [2] Cutoff value of ureteral diameter ratio for predicting spontaneous resolution of vesicoureteral reflux
    Wong, Shin Mei
    Tseng, Chi-Shin
    Hong, Jian-Hua
    Huang, Kuo-How
    Chiang, I-Ni
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 34 (02) : 75 - 79
  • [3] Validation of the ureteral diameter ratio for predicting early spontaneous resolution of primary vesicoureteral reflux
    Arlen, Angela M.
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    Leong, Traci
    Cooper, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (04) : 383 - 388
  • [4] An evaluation of ureteral diameter ratio and vesicoureteral reflux index in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux
    Baltrak, Yusuf Atakan
    Akdogan, Nebil
    Deger, Mutlu
    Izol, Volkan
    Aridogan, Ibrahim Atilla
    Satar, Nihat
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 11 (03) : 437 - 442
  • [5] Featuring: Distal ureteral diameter in the resolution of vesicoureteral reflux
    Bayne, Christopher E.
    Cardona-Grau, Diana
    Hsieh, Michael H.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (03) : 248 - 249
  • [6] PREDICTING VESICOURETERAL REFLUX RESOLUTION: ANALYSIS OF VUR INDEX, DISTAL URETERAL DIAMETER RATIO, AND INTERNATIONAL REFLUX GRADE
    Wu, Charlotte Q.
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    Leong, Traci
    Cooper, Christopher S.
    Arlen, Angela M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E942 - E943
  • [7] DISTAL URETERAL DIAMETER RATIO AS A PREDICTOR FOR VESICOURETERAL REFLUX ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT SUCCESS
    Zorkin, Sergei
    Shakhnovskiy, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E966 - E967
  • [8] The ureteral diameter ratio as a predictive factor in renal scarring associated with primary vesicoureteral reflux
    Onder, Esra Nagehan Akyol
    Ensari, Esra
    Ozkol, Mine
    Yilmaz, Omer
    Taneli, Can
    Ertan, Pelin
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2023, 19 (04) : 467.e1 - 467.e7
  • [9] INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF DISTAL URETERAL DIAMETER RATIO COMPARED TO GRADE FOR VESICOURETERAL REFLUX
    Swanton, Amanda
    Arlen, Angela M.
    Alexander, Siobhan E.
    Kieran, Kathleen
    Storm, Douglas W.
    Cooper, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E735 - E736
  • [10] Does the distal ureteral diameter ratio (UDR) matter in the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in children?
    Carlucci, Marcello
    Damasio, Maria B.
    Parodi, Stefano
    Anfigeno, Lorenzo
    Caprioli, Simone
    Ottolenghi, Sara
    Piaggio, Giorgio
    Fiorenza, Venusia
    Mattioli, Girolamo
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 39 (01)