The Immune System of the Critically Ill Patient

被引:0
|
作者
Vogeler, Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schenz, Judith
Mueller, Eckhard
Weigand, Markus
Fischer, Dania
机构
[1] Salem Krankenhaus Heidelberg, Abt Innere Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikums Heidelberg, Abt Anasthesiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Unive Klinikum Heidelberg, Klin Anasthesie, Neuenheimer Feld 672, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
critical illness; sepsis; immune senescence; fever; immunosuppression; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; PERSISTENT INFLAMMATION; SEPSIS; FEVER; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; HYPERTHERMIA; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1055/a-2070-3516
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Critically ill patients often experience a dysregulated immune response, leading to immune dysfunction. Sepsis, trauma, severe infections, and certain medical conditions can trigger a state of systemic inflammation, known as the cytokine storm. This hyperactive immune response can cause collateral damage to healthy tissues and organs, exacerbating the patient's condition. On the other hand, some critically ill patients may suffer from immune paralysis which can increase the risk of nosocomial infections. Fever is an evolutionary adaptation that evolved as an effective defense mechanism to fight invading pathogens. By raising body temperature, fever enhances the immune response, inhibits pathogen growth, promotes recovery, and aids in the formation of immune memory. Understanding the role of fever in the context of immune defense is crucial for optimizing medical interventions and supporting the body's natural ability to combat infections. Future Directions: Advancements in immunology research and technology hold promise for better understanding the immune system's complexities in critically ill patients. Personalized medicine approaches may be developed to tailor therapies to individual patients based on their immune profile, optimizing treatment outcomes. Based on recent studies prognostic parameters such as lymphocyte count, IL-10 concentration and mHLA-DR expression can be used to stratify the immunological response pattern in septic patients. Conclusion: The immune system's response in critically ill patients is a multifaceted process, involving intricate interactions between various immune cells, cytokines, and organs. Striking the delicate balance between immune activation and suppression remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Continued research and therapeutic innovations are vital to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of critical illness on healthcare systems.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 112
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT AND GYNECOLOGIST
    ASTRACHAN, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1973, 116 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [32] ASSESSMENT OF THE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
    RUNCIE, CJ
    DOUGALL, JR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1990, 43 (01): : 74 - 76
  • [33] Hyperglycemia in the Critically Ill Patient
    Gearhart, Michelle M.
    Parbhoo, Shilpa K.
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 17 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [34] THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN THE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
    BOGDONOFF, DL
    WILLIAMS, ME
    STONE, DJ
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 5 (03) : 186 - 205
  • [35] Sleep in the critically ill patient
    Weinhouse, Gerald L.
    Schwab, Richard J.
    SLEEP, 2006, 29 (05) : 707 - 716
  • [36] Pneumothorax in the Critically Ill Patient
    Yarmus, Lonny
    Feller-Kopman, David
    CHEST, 2012, 141 (04) : 1098 - 1105
  • [37] HYPERALIMENTATION IN THE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
    BLACKBURN, GL
    HEART & LUNG, 1979, 8 (01): : 67 - 70
  • [38] Hypocalcemia in the Critically Ill patient
    Kelly, Andrea
    Levine, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (03) : 166 - 177
  • [39] Plasmapheresis in the critically ill patient
    Berlot, G
    Tomasini, A
    Silvestri, L
    Gullo, A
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 53 : S178 - S181
  • [40] Infections and the Compromised Immune Status in the Chronically Critically Ill Patient: Prevention Strategies
    Cabrera-Cancio, Margarita R.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2012, 57 (06) : 979 - 992